"Truth seldom is pleasant; it is almost invariably bitter. A loss of courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days..." Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Commencement address at Harvard University , June 8, 1978
Monday, 29 November 2010
I am sure you will remember the constant hollow rhetoric spilled to us by the Labour Government about how they were “tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime!” But this has been proved to be nothing but lip service from the LIEbour camp; under the LIEour government, we saw a frightening rise in violence on Britain’s streets, including a worrying 40 per cent increase in knife killings.
That’s the legacy that Labour left behind, and that is one of the reasons why the people turned their backs on Labour and voted Conservative at the last election, in hope they will be the tougher option.
Statistics which are available show that, so far this year an average of four people a week are being stabbed on Britain’s streets- a statistic which can not be ignored and is completely unacceptable in a so-called civil society.
The latest of these killings occurred yesterday. A popular and hard working shopkeeper was fatally stabbed in the convenience store. His life, to the perpetrators, was worth taking away for a few cartoons of cigarettes, some liquor and a small amount of cash that was in the till… What does that say about our society When so little worth is placed on another human beings life?
In the family flat above the store, his poor daughter watched this vile, pointless killing on CCTV, traumatising the poor girl for life…
Now, if you think back to before the election, the Tories were riding on their high horse, exclaiming to be the only party who would tackle the problem with violent crime head on, they explicitly explained in their manifesto that anyone convicted of a knife crime could expect a prison sentence… What a load of hog wash that has turned out to be!!! Once they got elected, all their eagerness to tackle violent crime seemed to disappear.(I am in no doubt, when its election time again, they will regain this eagerness!!)
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke- who is already under fire for his half-baked scheme of scraping short-term sentences for a wide range of serious crimes- has now come out saying that jailing knife criminals, except in the most extreme cases, “would not be likely to be a more effective deterrent” than community punishments.
I would like to know what world he is living on.. Study after study has proven community penalties to be inconsistent at its best, and a bad joke at worst. The most recent research which was published by the Policy Exchange think tank last week, concluded that half of these so called effected means of punishment were uncompleted, their purpose was confused, the “work” was often insanely easy, and 40 per cent of those placed on these useless schemes, went on to re-offend.
I am not going to sit here and tell you that a prison sentence will turn a violent criminal into a model citizen, but at least it takes those who put the public at risk off the streets, and offers a glimmer of hope that they re-evaluate their lives and reflect on their deeds.. And also gives society a rest from their violent actions.
You would not be wrong for thinking that this isn’t the first u-turn that the conservatives have made in the short period of them being in a position of power and entering an unstable coalition. They have also failed to abolish the insane Human Rights Act, which is stopping us from deporting foreign criminals once they have finished serving their sentence. Both this u-turn and the u-turn on knife and other violent crime is to appease the ultra- left Liberal Democrats who prefer to see criminals as mere victims of an unfair society, rather than a danger…
Successive governments have promised to crack down on crime, but time and time again, fail to do so… There is only one party left in the UK who has the nerve and the determination to tackle crime, especially violent crime, with a no-nonsense policy. The first duty of any government is to protect its citizens. In this respect successive Labour and Conservative governments would have to be adjudged as failures. Where the law is broken the National Front believes that there must be a larger element of punishment within the sentencing system. In the case of perpetrators of some violent crimes we would introduce birching in addition to other sentences. For crimes of extreme violence such as aggravated rape, murder and terrorist offences, the NF would introduce the death penalty.
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Once again, what the National Front has been saying for over 40 years has been proved right by another report. It has been revealed that white Britons will be a minority by 2066 if the current influx of un-wanted guests continues unabated, according to research by Professor David Coleman, of Oxford University.
This leading population expert has warned that failure to deal with the influx of foreign workers could “change the national identity”.
Professor Coleman’s comments come just as the Migration Advisory Board prepares to give its recommendations for the coalition’s proposed cap on immigration.
It cannot not be denied on any level, something has to be done before we lose our country to unwanted and un-needed guests. If immigration continues at its current level on the long term, which is estimated at around 180,000 (not including illegal immigrants) a year, the white British born population would face a sharp decline from 80 per cent to a mere 59 per cent in 2051, according to an analysis of figures from the Office of National Statistics. If the trend continues, the British, as defined as English, Welsh, Scottish, and Irish Born citizens, will be a minority in their own country by 2066.
Now, the Coalition has proposed a cap on immigration, which sounds great right? No,.. before you get too excited, instead of helping the dire situation we Britons find ourselves in, it will only prolong the inevitable. Even if they get the cap down to say 80,000 a year, prof Coleman says white Britons would be outnumbered by 2080.
Lets stop beating around the bush, and lets get down to the hard facts. We are in a desperate situation… the ethnic minority population grew by an astounding 2 million between 2001 and 2007, from 13 per cent to nearly 16 per cent, and now, foreign mothers account for a quarter of all births in Britain. Both Leicester and Birmingham are expected to become white minority areas in the next 20 years, while two London boroughs have already become white minority areas.
We must put an end to this despicable situation which has been forced upon us by greedy and spineless governments, whose only interest is profit through the importation of cheap labour. Is this really a legacy you want to leave your children and great grand children? To you really want to allow them to become outnumbered in their own land, with no country to truly call their own?
It is a sad fact that many Britons have watched and allowed their country be given away, and it is truly disappointing to see this once great nation become the third rate hell hole it has become. But its not too late to change these dire circumstances.. there is still a shining hope, a beacon of light as it were… Our hope lies with the National Front… The ONLY British political party who holds British interests at heart, and would see to it that all immigration is brought to a halt, and a humane and phrased policy of repatriation would be put into place to ensure that Britain remains British.
Britain must remain in British Hands.,..
Friday, 12 November 2010
IAIN DUNCAN SMITH'S WELFARE PROPOSALS TO LEAVE POOR DESTITUTE WHILE 70% OF THE 4 MILLION NEW JOBS TAKEN BY IMMIGRANTS
Yesterday, Work and Pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith unveiled his half-baked welfare reforms, in which he vowed to put the brakes on the UK’s benefits gravy train…. While this sounds good, and I would be the first to say that the work shy should be punished by having their benefits taken from them, his plans would also severely effect those who are eagerly looking for work in an environment where there is no work to be found.
His proposals are ludicrous beyond belief… Lets look at this logically… If their isn’t much work available, how are those looking for work supposed to find a job. This is the fatal flaw in Iain’s proposals…. Without work they cant work. It is really that simple.
I do agree with some aspects of the proposal; for instance, his new Universal Credit, which will replace all benefits in 2013, will make sure anyone turning down employment or training courses will see their benefits stopped, which is fair enough. However, what I don’t agree with, is also punishing those who are more than actively looking for work, and cant find any.. The risk is, the poor could end up destitute as they get punished for a situation that the present government and the former government created..
Iain Duncan Smith revealed also yesterday that there was 4 million jobs created under LIEbour, and a huge 70 per cent was taken by immigrants.
The reason for all these reforms is to try and get out of the debt that Labour created for us… So let me give a few of my ideas to ease the debt, while still ensuring that there is a viable safety net for those unfortunate enough to be out of work.
Firstly; the 70 per cent of those 4 million jobs should be taken away from the non-natives, and be reserved for native Britons, which would ease the unemployment rate by an huge amount,
Secondly; Instead of sending billions of pounds to foreign nations in the name of aid, we should keep the money in our own hands, we may find we are not actually that bad off, and these desperate and damaging cuts being put forward by the traitors in Parliament would not be needed…
The National Front is a party of common sense. We believe that looking after the British Public is the number one goal of any government, unlike the current and past governments, who seem to think Britain should be the worlds bank, and the worlds employer… We will ensure that British jobs will remain in British hands, and while we will keep the safety net of the benefit system, we would also create initiatives to get people back into work, and those who refuse to go to work when the opportunity arises because they have become too comfortable on benefits would be punished with a cut to their benefits….
Tuesday, 9 November 2010
Today is a good day… A Muslim Religious Channel that allowed presenters to openly condone rape and allowed presenters to label women who wear perfume outside of their home as prostitutes, has thankfully been censured by the TV watchdog, Ofcom.
This disgusting channel, in one programme, had the host telling viewers that it was not “strange” and “not such a big problem” for a man to force his wife to have sex. Ofcom ruled the Islam channel, which broadcasts on Sky, severely in breach of the broadcasting code in five programmes between May 2008 and October 2009.
One presenter once claimed:
“In Islam we have no right to hit the woman in a way that damages her eye or damages her tooth or damages her face or makes her ugly.
'Maximum what you can do, you can see the pen over here, in my hand, this kind of stick can be used just to make her feel that you are not happy with her.'
(What a nice sentiment from the religion of peace?!)
The Islam Channel, many would say , is the voice of moderate Islam. But how moderate can this channel be when it advocates martial rape and violence against women, and has given airtime to groups that have condoned suicide bombings, such as the group Hizb ut-Tahir? But maybe we should ask ourselves, is there any real difference between “moderate Islam” and “extremist Islam”?
The fact that this channel is still allowed to pump its vile views to the nation is disturbing. Lets be honest, if a Christian channel allowed any views that remotely mirrored that of which the Islam Channel advocated, it would have been threatened with closure and the media would be up in arms. Yet notice the eerie silence coming from the mainstream media?