MPS COULD SOON BE VOTING ON THE REINTRODUCTION OF THE DEATH PENALTY!

A new government initiative means that online e-petitions which reach over 100,000 signatures MUST be considered for a commons debate. And as a indication of the feelings of the British public, over 40 of the first 200 internet petitions called for the return of the death penalty.

With this great news, I am going to take the opportunity to put forward some agruments in favour of reintroducing the death penalty for the most vile criminals in our society, like paedophiles, child killers, sadistic murderers, ect.

-It cannot be denied that Capital Punishment permanently removes the worst criminals from our society, and is the safest method of dealing with certain sick individuals, which still pose a threat, while in long term or permanent incarceration. It goes without saying that dead criminals cannot cause anyone anymore harm, either within the prison system or after escaping or after being released.

-The cost of incarcerating the most horrific criminal of our society is another reason for capital punishment. According to the Guardian, it cost on average, £83,000 a year to imprison an inmate. Money is not an inexhaustible commodity and with all honesty, that money would be better spent on the old, the young, the sick ect, 6 rather than using our resources on the long term imprisonment of murderers, paedophiles, rapists. Ect

We have all heard the very real arguments that today’s prison system is pretty much a holiday camp for prisoners. With this in mind, lets point out that execution of the very worst of criminals is a very real punishment, rather than some form of ineffective “rehabilitative” treatment.

A very good question is: does the death penalty deter criminals? Now, this is a very difficult point to prove one way or another because in most retentionist countries the number of people actually executed per year (as compared to those sentenced to death) is usually very low. However, it would seem, that in countries where they almost always carry out the death sentences, (EG Singapore) there is far less serious crime. What this suggests is that, capital punishment is only a real determent if the execution is an almost certainty. Those Anti-capital punishment campaigners always argue that the death penalty isn’t a determent, and will usually site studies based on American states to prove their point. From where I am standing, this is deeply flawed and properly chosen to be deliberately misleading.

The above is just a brief look at the arguments for capital punishment. The National Front have been campaigning for over 40 years for the return to true justice, including the return of Capital Punishment. No other Political Party can even claim to be as long term advocates as the National Front, because unlike many other partys we do not compromise on our polices, and they do not change with media manipulated public opinion.

WELCOME TO CUCKOO LAND: THE EU BUDGET COMMISSIONER ANNOUNCE PLANS FOR SIX PER CENT BUDGET INCREASE

Late last week more evidence came to light which proves that the idiotic European Bureaucrats are truly living in cloud cuckoo land. On April 28th, they brushed aside the economic crisis, and seemed to forget the grave effects it has had on countries such as Britain, and announced plans for a staggering six per cent budget increase.

On the most shocking aspects of this increase is that the auditors have refused point blank to sign off the commission’s accounts for the past 15 years due to inconsistencies which may be down to fraud.

The huge increase will see the EU budget rise by £7billion to a knee crippling £114billion. Britain is currently the second highest contributor to the EU budget, handing over a record £7.9 billion this year.

The proposed six per cent increase will see this increase by a huge £450million. But with this insane figure in mind, experts are also saying that this figure could be an understatement, since the EU Commission has not taken into account the cost of the pointless Diplomatic service, which is expected to add billions to the bill.

EU budget commissioner Janusz Lewandowski said the huge increase was needed to help aid economic recovery in Europe. But this doesn’t make sense, since it would be more beneficial to economic recovery if independent nations kept the money, especially in such times of austerity .

In such times, nations all across Europe are tightening their belts, and maybe its time the EU caught up and did the same.

The proposal isn’t a dead cert yet, since it has to be approved by the European Parliament and EU leaders, however, sources say that the great bulk of the proposal will be nodded through without question.

What we must remember is that the EU is a corrupt institution which is taking away tax payers money for its own purpose. The British people did not give it the go ahead, we never said we wanted apart of the EU. It boggles the mind how anyone would want to be apart of an institution which has not has its books signed off in 15 years…. Its border line criminal. The Government had no right to give our country away to the EU, because it is not theirs to give… ITS OURS! It is treason, and it is up to the public to show their distaste towards the cowards and traitors currently running this country into the ground, by supporting a party that will withdraw from the EU and look out for our own interests.

Britain would be a much richer country if it weren’t for the EU, and we would have more control over our own affairs. We need to get out before all our freedoms, and our national sovereignty is sold away to the corrupt, tyrannical European Union.

WHEN WILL THE BRITISH PEOPLE WAKE UP! ISLAM OUT OF BRITAIN NOW!!!

THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION AND YOU

There is an endless list of why Britain should cut all ties with the European Parliament. If Britain doesn’t, then the British people will loose their sovereignty. The fact that the EU is doing everything in its power to force the sinister European Constitution onto the British public is a clear sign of the EU’s ambition of becoming a Superstate, in which they wish Britain to be a part of. We must resist this tyrannical, foreign body, otherwise we will become a mere state in the United States of Europe, and have no control over our nation.

The European Constitution will only have adverse effects for Britain. I have outlined a few of the issues that we would face under European rule.

1. The European Constitution would make it harder to fight crime.

The Constitutional Treaty would give the EU considerable power over crime, policing and our Law Courts. This sinister treaty would mean that that EU judges would gain power over justice and policing. Under the constitution, the European Court of Justice would become the highest court in the land and would also mean that a substantial amount of Britain’s laws would be created in Brussels; which is a huge transfer of our national sovereignty, as the government have admitted.

Under EU law, it would become illegal to try someone twice for the same crime. This would mean that criminals like Billy Dunlop would be walking the streets. In case you didn’t know; Billy Dunlop was successfully convicted of murdering Julie Hogg when new evidence came to light 15 years after he was acquitted.

The Constitutional Treaty also states that the severity of penalties should not be disproportionate to the criminal offence. This would undermine the discretion of British judges to keep infamous killers like Rosemary West in prison for life.

The treaty would allow the EU police force, Europol, to conduct investigations on British soil. This has worrying implications, because unlike the British police forces, Europol officers are largely unaccountable. They are completely immune to prosecution for acts performed in the course of their duties, and they are also not compelled to testify in court. Europol also has its own problems with fraud, for example, its offices were raided by Belgium police as part of a fraud investigation.

The European Prosecutor Eurojust, will also get sweeping new powers. A spokesman for Eurojust- Johannes Thuy- confirmed that “ we would compel the British police to make a prosecution.”

2. The European Constitution would give the EU power over our foreign policy and defence.

If the constitution does get accepted, it would mean that there will be an EU foreign Minister, an EU Diplomatic Service, and the constitution would give the right to the EU to sign treaties on our behalf.

The Spanish Prime Minister, Jose Zapatero, predicts that “ we will undoubtedly see European embassies in the world, not ones from each country, with European diplomats and a European foreign service. We will see Europe with a single voice in security matters. We will have a single voice within NATO”. At first the British Government opposed many of these proposals, but being weak kneed it soon gave in.

The Constitutional Treaty also would set up a “structured cooperation” group, in which the UK will be forced to be apart of. The treaty states that members would have to achieve “ approved objectives concerning the level of investment expenditure on defence equipment and bring their defence apparatus into line with each other”. In a European Federalists research paper they noted that “Structured Co-operation in the field of defence is a significant step toward a Single European Army”.
German Chancellor Angela Merkal has also expressed a want for a single European Army: “ Within the EU itself, we will have to move closer to establishing a common European army”.

Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi has said “ When I was talking about the European army, I was not joking. If you don’t want to call it a European army, don’t call it a European army. You can call it “Margaret”, you can call it “Mary Anne”, you can call it any name”.

The Spanish Prime Minister Jose Zapatero said that “ Europe must believe that it can be in 20 years the most important world power! The constitution is an important step in this direction”.

What all this means in practice is that while our troops are being undermined in Afghanistan and Iraq with poor equipment and a want for just the basic equipment, the EU wants to divert billions of pounds to wasteful projects such as the Galileo satellite System- all because of its desire to play the role of world “Superpower”. Put aside the fact that our troops should not even be in Afghanistan or Iraq, the above is bad for our armed forces.

3. The Constitution would mean that we would have less control over Asylum Seekers and immigrants.

Under the Constitution Treaty, the European Court of Justice would gain a considerably amount of new powers to determine the “rights” of Asylum seekers and immigrants to reside in Britain. The Government have admitted that with the introduction of the Constitution Treaty would come more expensive Asylum and immigration appeals. In November 2006 Geoff Hoon said: “There is clearly a risk that adding what is in effect an avenue of appeal at a very early stage in the process might be an opportunity of further complicating of further complicating our existing asylum and immigration processes.”

The Charter of Fundamental Right, which is legally binding under the sinister constitution, would mean that Britain would not be able to deport terror suspects and other foreign criminals. This would mean, on top of all the other immigrants draining tax payers money away, we would have to pay for these criminals, and we would have to subsidize asylum seekers who are waiting for their case to be heard. It currently takes two years before the European Court of Justice even begins to hear an appeal.

Under the constitution there will be a new “burden sharing” requirement, which means that British taxpayers, who are already burdened with immigrants, will have to pay for immigrants in other countries.

Noone can disagree that under the Constitutional Treaty the European Court of Justice would end up making what is essentially political decisions. It wouldn’t matter if the entire British public disagreed with what the EU were doing, it would be impossible to overturn the rulings.

4. The Constitutional Treaty would mean the EU had more control over our public services.

HEALTH AND EDUCATION
The Constitutional treaty means that the EU would have complete control over the British Health service, and the British people would have no right to reject legislation in this area. This would mean that the EU would regulate medical standards. A new “right to preventive healthcare2 would open the NHS up to influx of costly ambulance-chasing lawsuits. The constitution would end the right to reject legislation concerning trade agreements in public services like health and education. In other words, our Parliament would no longer have a say over deals which will determine how these services are managed.

TRANSPORT: Under the constitution, the British people would loss the right to reject legislation concerning transport. Jacques Barrot, EU Transport Commissioner, recently revealed that the EU wants to run EU wide road pricing operations, but as the AA point out, this would lead to a huge loss of privacy.

The above is only a few of the issues that Britain face if the UK accepts the wretched Constitutional Treaty, and in doing so accept the tyrannical rule of the European Union. Below I have outlined some of the policies of the National front which relate to the above issues.

European Union.

The National Front supports the right of self-determination for all European nations and demands that right for Britain. It seeks a Europe where each nation is friendly to all others but where no nation seeks to dominate or interfere in the affairs of another. Consequently the NF would withdraw Britain from the European Union.
The NF would encourage the development of cultural and sporting links between other European nations. It would encourage the cultural diversity between the nations of Europe and resist attempts to eliminate this. It totally opposes the monetary and political merging of the separate nations into a super-state.

Defence
The protection of the British people at home and throughout the world is the responsibility of the government. It is for this purpose (and this purpose alone) that we require our armed forces, which have such a proud record in defending our nation. No British politician wants a war but it is a sad fact that Britain must always be prepared for a whole range of eventualities including the less likely ones. This is particularly true when the Middle East is in a period of change and uncertainty.

There is no realistic defence without a basic defence strategy. The National Front's defence strategy is that Britain must maintain a defence capability able to inflict massive damage on any other countries in the world should they act as an aggressor. The only other requirement is the ability of our forces to defeat any internal terrorist threat. The equipment with which our forces are armed must be designed and built in the UK and must remain solely under the control of this country.

The National Front totally opposes the use of British troops by the United Nations to carry out their political adventures. It also opposes any attempt to form a European army under foreign control and will withdraw Britain from NATO.

Race and immigration
The National Front believes that the world contains a rich diversity of races and consequent cultures. We believe in the preservation of these races. As each race has evolved it has developed its own social structures, its own customs and its own culture. These are different for each race and have been built up to suit the character of each separate race.

In the case of Britain the National Front upholds the wish of the majority of British people for Britain to remain a white country, with customs and a culture which have been developed to suit our character. Consequently the National Front would halt all non-white immigration into Britain and introduce a policy of phased and humane repatriation of all coloured people currently resident here. Such a policy would be expected to extend over 10-15 years and its completion would thus depend on the recurrent election of successive NF governments.

The National Front believes that this is the only way to halt the steadily rising racial tension and violence that is becoming part of everyday life in modern Britain.

In regards to white immigration, this would only be allowed where there are particular reasons such as the possession of particular skills or in the case of political refugees. Until the problem of unemployment is solved, the NF would seek to keep such immigration to a minimum

NHS
The National Front would provide an entirely free National Health Service and this would include the abolition of prescription charges. When people fall ill they are likely to be losing money in any case and we can see no justification in prescription charges. However, checks on doctors' prescriptions would be made to make sure the Health Service is not wasting money.

Whilst the NF expects all parts of the NHS to use money efficiently and carefully, a National Front government would make available sufficient funds to eliminate all waiting lists for medically needed operations and treatments. This will take priority over other items of expenditure.

The National Front believes that the NHS should be made available to all foreign visitors who fall ill during their stay, however this system is being abused by people who arrive in this country fully aware of an existing health condition - this would be stopped. The NF is opposed to abortion on principle and would only sanction one where a mother has conceived as a result of rape, where medical opinion asserts that there is a genuine and serious danger to the health or life of the mother if the pregnancy is allowed to continue, or where medical opinion asserts that the foetus is seriously damaged or malformed. All such abortions are dependent on the mother's consent. Under a National Front government the days of abortion being used as a form of post-coital contraception will end.

FREEDOM
For the last thousand years the British people have fought, and sometimes died, to preserve our basic freedoms. The National Front wholeheartedly believes that these freedoms must be maintained. Consequently the National Front believes in the introduction of a bill of rights to guarantee basic freedoms including:

Equal and free access to justice
Freedom of speech and publication and distribution of printed matter
Freedom of access to publicly owned assembly facilities
Freedom for orderly demonstrations in public
The right to vote and stand for election for public office without onerous financial or other qualifications
Freedom from arbitrary arrest

Those are a few of our policies which I think are relevant here.

Moving on.

WHAT WILL THE SWINDON NF DO TO HELP STOP THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION BEING ACCEPTED IN BRITAIN.
The National Front, up and down the country, will continue to campaign against EU dictatorship in Britain. However on a local level I have started a campaign. Its an attempt to make central Government stick to their promise and give the British people a referendum. And everyone of you can help. In actual fact, I need everyone of you to help. Whether you live in Swindon or not, it doesn’t matter. As long as you have a voice than you can help.

Basically, I have found a way in which to bring about a referendum in a Parish council which poses the question: “ should there be a national referendum on Britain’s membership in the EU?” More Councils- district councils, parish councils ect- that hold a referendum and with more “yes” votes, the more likely that Brown will hold a referendum.

I will give anyone who is willing to try and make a difference all the guidance and advice they will need- everything from lists of legislation that gives them the right to hold a referendum, to how you can insure you will get a good turn out.

If you are interested please email me at Swindon@yahoo.co.uk, and we will win this fight together.

BRITAIN FIRST- VOTE NATIONAL FRONT

REPORT REVEALES THAT BIG BROTHER HAS FAILED: CCTV HAS DONE VIRTUALLY NOTHING TO CUT CRIME

A report done by Cambridge University academic David Farrington for the Campbell Collaboration Study Group and funded by the Home Office, has found that the millions of CCTV cameras on Britain’s streets has down virtually nothing to cut crime.

Lib-Lab-Con’s big brother society in which has seen cameras going up in town centres, housing estates and on public transport, has not had any significant effect on cutting crime. They had promised that CCTV was for our protection and to help prevent crime, but as the report reveals, it has had no effect.

With this in mind, ask yourself this question; what is the point in CCTV cameras if they do not prevent crime? And what should replace cameras to truly prevent crime?

We here at the National Front believe that true Community policing is the way forward to tackling crime. This would mean that we would bring police officers back on to Britain’s streets, with a zero tolerance policy towards anti-social behaviour, and illegal drug use. We would scrap the useless PCSO’s who have no powers whatsoever, and are nothing but the laughing stock of the community as yobs run rings around them at YOUR expense. The Government go on about being tough on crime, however, since 1997, Britain has become a haven for criminals. Crime has risen, even though that 4.2 million CCTV cameras have been installed at the expense of £500 million of Taxpayer’s money.

This surveillance society has been put in place to watch the public not protect it. Put a stop to Big Brother by joining the National Front, the only party fighting for your FREEDOM

SWINDON NATIONAL FRONT INVESTIGATES PART 1: ASYLUM SEEKERS AND THE HARBOUR

I wanted to know what services were available to asylum seekers and refugees in Swindon. So I went to interview a certain Mr Gerd Muller from the Harbour Project, in Broad Street.

The Harbour Project is a charity that provides services to asylum seekers and refugees. And the information I found was not really that shocking, not for me anyway- however, for the average Joe, who are only fed what the media and mainstream politicians want them to be fed, it may be a bit of an eye opener in various ways.

On the 7th of May, I went to the Harbour, and met Mr Muller. We sat in his Office, and as he was totally oblivious of who I am, and in actual fact didn’t have a clue that I am NF, starts off into a rant about how Asylum seekers have sub-standard housing and how they should be given more rights. And, as tempted as I was, I resisted arguing that in fact, asylum seekers have no right to be here, and in fact, if they were asylum seekers they would of resided in the next safe country, not crossing entire continents and 17+ safe countries to get to the “push over” known as Britain. But I had to keep my mouth shut and give him the impression that I was in agreement, otherwise I wouldn’t be able to get information out of him, and he would likely tell me to leave.

Anyway, after I told him that I had a place to be, and that I really needed to start the interview, he started giving me the goods.

The Harbour is a charity that is almost completely funded by the Swindon Borough Council (I am in the process of finding the exact amount from the council.) which in turn means that you, the tax payer, are funding the services that Harbour provides. So, you may be glad to hear that you, the taxpayer are paying your council tax so that the poor old “bogus” asylum seeker could use the Internet, make international phone calls, get free clothes and furniture, food parcels, and food bank vouchers, in which they can go to the Food bank in Swindon and collect a whole weeks worth of food, on top of this, the local authority provide these people, who have never paid a day of tax in their lives, with accommodation, fully paid by the council, benefits of £30 pound a week, and free educational classes in English.

Then, when the asylum seekers’ claim for asylum gets approved by the Home Office, they are then classed as refugees, which, in simple terms mean that they are citizens just without a British passport. They are then entitled to the same benefits as you, can get accommodation, and get free health care, all this while still receiving services from the Harbour, like free internet access, international calls, food parcels, food bank vouchers, clothing, furniture, ect… And while these people live on the body of our nation like leaches, British pensioners are left to rot in care homes, on state pensions that just cover the basics. Why is it fair that pensioners get less then unwanted guests that do not belong here, and have only come here to exploit the generous benefit system?

It may not be surprising to hear that since 2002, the amount of visitors to the Harbour has risen by almost 5,000 per annum. As the graph (below), which was given to me by Mr Muller, shows that in 2002/2003 the amount of visitors at the Harbour is just under 1,000, and in 2008/2009 the amount of visitors in that year was almost 6,000. As those familiar with Swindon will know, Broad Street, and the surrounding area is pretty much a non-white area, and as you will have also of noticed, what once was a relatively clean area, is now a complete dump, with rubbish dumped in every back allow. So they not only are taking taxpayers money, they are turning our streets in to their own personal dustbins.



If these so called asylum seekers were in deed, at risk in their country of origin, then they would go to the nearest safe nation. Under a National Front government, asylum seekers would cease to be brought to Britain, and future refugee assistance would take place in the country of origin of the natural disaster, famine or conflict or the nearest country that will provide a safe haven until the problems in their country of origin has been resolved. All the money that is put into the Harbour could be better spent, like on the failing educational system, or in helping the pensioners of Swindon stay warm during winter, or insuring that white, British families keep a roof over their heads. Stop wasting Tax payers’ money, VOTE NF

THE UK WILL HAVE TO BUILD A HOUSE EVERY SIX MINUTES TO KEEP UP WITH IMMIGRATION

An ex-Labour Minister claimed last week that the UK would have to build a house every six seconds around the clock for 20 years to keep up with the influx of immigrants. The former Welfare Minister, Frank Field, said that 70 percent of population growth in that 20 year time frame would be down to the influx of non-Britons. This amounts to 7 million people- or to but it in a different perspective, that is 7 new Birmingham’s.

Its not often that someone from Labour actually give the facts about immigration. And it is a very rare occasion that I agree with someone from Labour, but, I do agree with Frank when he said that the only losers are the indigenous Britons. And, its time that the British people woke the hell up to the current situation that Britain finds itself in. We are running out of time. It has been predicted that within the next hundred years that the native, white, British People will be a minority in their own country.

When we reach a situation that 40 percent of all houses built in Britain over the last decade have been given to immigrants-is official statistics suggest- then we must start to realise that we are losing our country..

Nearly 600,000 properties have been needed to house immigrants since 1997- an average of 66,000 each year from 1997 to 2005 ( the latest year figures are available)- making it a grand total of 592,000 homes. And experts say that this number would have risen since 2005 due to mass eastern European immigration.

We wouldn’t need to build so many houses- 40 percent less. We need to preserve our pleasant green land, we are a small country, we limited space, we cannot keep building, because, not before too long, we will have run out of space, and then what. Vote National Front, and insure that our children and our grand children have a land to live off. WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTANCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR WHITE CHILDREN.

LABOUR TO INTRODUCE ANTI-WHITE LEGISLATION

The Equalities Minister Harriet Harman has revealed that the Labour regime will formerly introduce anti-white legislation in the awarding of Government contracts. The measures will mean that firms that want tax-payer funded work could be judged on brand new criteria including their gender and how many Non-whites they employ. This basically means that a company that employs British workers, even if they can deliver services at a much cheaper rate and much more efficiently, will be pushed aside in favour of company’s that employ the “correct” number of non-whites.

In the usual messed up logic of the liberal left, Ms Harman has said that her new Equalities Bill will mean the annual £175 billion public procurement budget will be used to promote “equality”. WRONG! Instead, her bill will force employers to favour female and non-white job applicants over equally qualified white men in order to make up the race quotas. As she herself inadvertently admits, Labour’s new bill will favour companies who employ non-whites…. She said “ All other things being equal, if there are two companies bidding for a contract and one has a much better equality record, then it would be down to the procuring authority to choose that one.” Ms Harman’s version of “equality” is in fact anti-white male discrimination.
No matter what label you put on it, it all amounts to discrimination….

And, we at the National Front are not the only ones to see fault in the new bill. I think it is worth noting that business leaders have said that Ms Harman’s bill will harm the UK economy. Miles Templeman, Director General of the Institute of Directors, said; “ Harriet Harman must be the only person in Britain to believe that in the midst of some of the most difficult business conditions in years, introducing yet more regulation is a way of “boosting economic recovery”.”

Sharia law being forced into Britain by the European Union….

Judges could soon be forced to bow down to Sharia Law in some divorce cases heard in Britain. An EU plan calls for family courts around Europe to hear cases using the laws of whichever country the couple involved have close links to…. First of all. If these people reside in this country, then they abide by British law, if they don’t like it, they should feel free to go to what ever country better suits them.

This plan would mean that a court in England would have to apply the laws of Saudi Arabia to a husband and wife living in Britain. Rightly, the Centre for Social Justice think tank attacked the so-called Rome III reform as ludicrous. It warned it would slow down cases, increase costs and lead to unjust results.

The tyrannical control the EU has over Britain has to stop now. We do not want Sharia Law, and we will not lay down and let the EU push it upon us.

The EU is anti-family, which is clear when one looks at some of the laws already concerning divorce. Currently, a couple from different EU states can have their divorce heard in the first country where one of them files divorce papers. Because different states offer varying financial advantages to spouses in terms of division of wealth, the resulting “race to court” in the best jurisdiction discourages couples from trying to save their marriages.

At the time of writing this, at least nine- not including the UK- are willing to accept the Rome III reform…. Lets just hope Britain wakes up, before our courts get turned into a mockery, where the vile Sharia law is practised…. Please, save our country from EU dictatorship. VOTE NF

BRITAIN MORE OF A POLICE STATE THAN SOVIET RUSSIA SAYS MOSCOW JOURNALIST.

A Russian Journalist who lived in the Soviet Union, but now is based in London, has said that the surveillance is worse in “Big Brother Britain” than it was in Russia during the communist dictatorship.

Irada Zeinalova said : “ Security has got absurd. I don’t like that level of intrusion into my private life. London is a Big Brother city. It is all watched by cameras. Even in the days of the USSR you couldn’t imagine such a number of cameras or observers. Your moves are monitored by your bus tickets. There are CCTV cameras on every building and computer chips on the rubbish bins…. They can tell a lot about your life by studying your rubbish bin. All aspects of your life are plainly visible here. .” Mrs Zeinalova, who is an award winning correspondent in London for the Kremlin controlled Moscow TV station Channel One,, added that Londoners seemed reassured by the level of security and imagined that if some major calamity occurred they would be caught on CCTV and be saved by the emergency services. She added: “ They explain the CCTV cameras on every corner by fighting terrorism and crime- but sadly it doesn’t solve the problems… by watching the rubbish bins, they waste more money than on the actual fight with the problems…”

This Russian Journalist does raise a good point… Britain has become a state which has traded its personal liberties in for a false sense of security. As much as the government will hate to admit it, measures like monitoring what you throw in the bin, actually does very little if anything in the fight against criminal behaviour. Law and Order can only be upheld if the government are confident in their policies, and are actually focused on preventing crime instead of watching the public.

The National Front would restore Law and Order by scraping changes to our laws resulting from European Union edicts, we would make so called “ no-go” areas where crime gangs and illegal activities prevail become Go! Go! Areas for police armed with a zero tolerance policy towards ALL forms of criminal activity. We will make it in no ones best interest to back chat or show disrespect to a police or customs officer. Such unacceptable behaviour would invite a prison term, thus respect for the Law would be restored. We would reinstate real community policing; instead of police officers being tied up behind desks in an office filling out forms and doing paperwork, they should be on the street, and insuring that the public are safe; PCSO’s should be replaced with police officers who can actually take action if they witness a crime, instead of PCSO’s just standing by and letting it happen ( under the Lib-Lab-Con coalition, if a PCSO physically restrains a suspect, they put themselves at risk from prosecution… ) And we would repeal all legislation relating to the failed doctrines of political correctness and the left wing rights movement, which will, with full backing from the courts, allow police officers to actually pursue criminals, which in simple terms means, that we would give the police force the authority it needs to do its job. And we will end this madness of Big Brother politics…. The British public are citizens of this nation not mere subjects, and therefore deserve to keep their private lives private…. FIGHT FOR BRITISH LIBERTIES, JOIN THE NATIONAL FRONT.

ONE IN SEVEN CHILDREN IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS DON’T SPEAK ENGLISH- WAKE UP BRITAIN!

Since 1967, the National Front has been warning the general public that if the borders are kept open for any Tom, Dick and Harry to wonder on in, then we, the white, British people will become a minority. Unfortunately, we were proved right by a staggering statistic that reveals that Britain is become unrecognisable as a nation in a worryingly fast pace.

Figures released ( see Daily Mail March 15th) reveal that as many as 14 per cent- one in seven- pupils speak English barely as a second language, if at all. That figure is a rise of 11 per cent in a mere 5 years.

As the Daily Mail reported, there are schools in some areas where there is a high immigration population, where a not even a handful of children speak English as their mother tongue. The study found one primary school that had 56 different languages being spoken.

What chance of an education will our children get if the already over-stretched teachers have to also deal with language barriers, and have to take extra time to make some pupils understand?

Its not fair on the teachers or the children who are being held back by their classmates language problems.

But, this goes beyond language, but we must also take into account culture and tradition- the very essence of nationhood- which divides the newcomers from the native, white, British children.

No one can deny this is a desperate situation we face as a nation. But you only have yourself to blame. We all know that Lib- Lab- Con haven’t got the first clue what makes a nation a nation, but you, the British public voted these idiots in.

With Lib- Lab- Con’s profound ignorance of British values and their “love” for modernity we have had these “ universal Human Rights” forced upon us ( which has lead to the end of traditional British Liberties) and the borders being thrown open for all our unwanted guests to come on in to have all the benefits withy none of the work.

The result- Our children have lost any sense of identity and lost any chance of an education.

GIVE OUR CHILDREN A FUTURE- VOTE NATIONAL FRONT

THE TRUTH ABOUT MULTICULTURALISM

In our liberal, morally defunct society, a day doesn’t go by without those in power declaring that Britain is a better, happier nation with a hotchpotch of cultures living under one roof. If it isn’t a politician it’s a news reporter, newspaper, school teacher indoctrinating our children with their Zionist approved communistic agenda.

But have you ever asked yourself… What is multiculturalism and why are our supposed leaders so hell bent on forcing it upon us?

The fact is multiculturalism is a deliberate policy to build, maintain and support foreign cultures to the direct detriment of the British identity, culture and our very way of life. The traitors in parliament are deliberately allowing alien cultures to flourish within Britain which is destroying any sense of community. Large sums of money are given to ethnic organisations which allows them to service and perpetrate their alien cultures. In our schools, non-British children are encouraged to identify with their heritage while White, British children are made to feel guilty for merely being born white. A prime example of British culture being pushed-out to make way for foreign and alien customs comes to us from Greenwood Junior School, Sneinton, Nottingham. Because of political-correctness the three day Islamic festival Eid al-Adha, which takes place between December 8th and 11th took precedent over the Christmas Nativity play, and other Christmas traditions which were all cancelled.

Britain, in a sense has become a breeding ground for “micro- nations”, each with their own unique political and cultural agendas. This has lead to Britons having to suffer many little Chinas, little Asia’s, little Africa’s, all of which are set out to preserve their own national, cultural and ethnic peculiarities (including “lovely” foods and dances, and also barbaric customs, including some very strong ethnic hatreds.) It is very easy to see the deep divide between these communities, but also between them and us Britons.

Through the idiotic policy of mass immigration and multiculturalism ethnic conclaves develop, and such ethnic ghettos provide the perfect environment for ethnic gangs that prey on their own communities and also darken our door steps; another down side to such non-white ghettos is that it gives them perfect basis for politically motivated violence. The future of multicultural Britain is a bleak one, where events like the riots in Oldham and other Northern cities will become common place.

In the cold light of day, multiculturalism can justly be regarded as a security threat, since, at some point the interests of Britain will clash with those of other nations, whether in the area of trade, politics or even in the danger of war, our unwanted guests will have to choose where their allegiance lies, and we Britons will be the losers.

Let’s put this in simpler terms. Because of the idiotic thinking of Liberal Internationalists, the British identity will be destroyed. Now don’t get me wrong, I am not putting this down to some world-wide conspiracy of some unseen elite who purposely bringing about the destruction of traditional Britain, however, this disastrous outcome is the inevitable conclusion of the thought-process of these liberal-Internationalists, whose actions WILL cause unconceivable amount of devastation, but because these “trendies” should know the result of their insane actions the destruction of Britain can be considered deliberate.

Our identity is being undermined, especially in our educational institutions, where our people our being taught that being British and having pride in your racial heritage is somehow racist, and this can only have adverse affects on the future of our people. Now, if this attack on Britain was being perpetrated by individual “lefties” and Internationalists then we wouldn’t have anything to worry about, unfortunately this is not how these people work. They lobby and push their ideas through academia, the media and the political machines; their ideas are then shoved into official acceptance until they become official policy; once the official policy stage is reached, these people go into overdrive; Official policy becomes their rationale for them to force their ideas on the community; the public service is then retrained and restructured to accommodate this new ideology; a new “public service” is created to build, promote and propagate their new set of ideas, spreading into the public sector, as well into the private sector, and even affecting private individuals, becoming a self-serving, self-sustaining industry hell-bent on forcing their ideology onto us; coinciding with all this, new laws are brought in which paints this illogical ideology as “right” and “respectable” while painting any opposing views as “wrong”, “unworthy” and in some cases “illegal”. Thanks to the media promoting this ideology the public get the impression that these views are held by the majority of the populace, while in fact it’s only the majority of the journalists that hold these views. In such a despicable climate it becomes “politically incorrect” to hold opposing views, while anyone who objects to this new set of ideas are labeled as cranks or downright criminals. Opponents in prominent positions are harassed, while people in the public sector, self-employed or any other assailable job stands to lose their livelihood if they dare speak out.

The most disturbing part in all this is that of education. It is in the very first years of a child’s school life that he/she is indoctrinated to accept multiculturalism as fact. No opposing ideas are aired in a class room. As in days of Galileo Galilei, where school children were taught that “the sun revolves around the earth” and any opposing ideas where mere heresy; in the modern context it is taught that “multiculturalism is good for us” and to oppose that would be dangerous and maybe even illegal.

MULTICUTURALISM MEANS
• The destruction of the British culture and identity, and the internationalization of all cultures. Therefore multiculturalism means no culture.
• Multiculturalism is expensive, contradictory and divisive.
• Multiculturalism is not fact; it is a liberalistic ideology forced upon us.
• Multiculturalism is not just the stupid folly of today; it is the destructive mistake of tomorrow.

Labour Gavornment Aiding & Abetting our Enemies

After a very grueling tour of Iraq, the heroes of the Royal Angelican Regiment paraded through the streets of Luton, in their home- the land for which they have risked their lives for.
No matter if you are for or against the war in Iraq, the greeting these brave soldiers received was disgraceful. A small group of hate-filled Muslims waved placards proclaiming "Anglian soldiers: Criminals, Muderers, Terrorists". One of these vile protesters spat at the mother of a soldier. All this with full police protection, which amounts to treason.
Welcome to multi-cultural Britain!
This society ehivh successive governments have created is sickening, and when looking at the events at Luton, you can understand why thousands of Brits are moving abroad. I mean, what kind of society allows such behaviour, yet will arrest anyone who apposes such anti-British attitudes.
You may not be aware, due to the media silence on the issue, but two people were arrested, one for "racially motivated harassment"; and wouldn't you know it- both were supporters of the troops.
The BBC (Blatantly Biased Corporation) have wheeled out the supposedly moderate Muslims (if such a thing exists) to try and persuade us to be sympathetic with the protestors, which is insulting to the British public to say the very least.
An idiotic Muslim by the name of Abdul Malik of Luton's Race Advisory Forum declares "We must welcome their viewpoint and give them some attention", adding that our troops have the right to come home to visit their families. How big of him.

Please, don't get me wrong, the National Front treasure the British freedom, to be allowed to protest against the Gov't policies (and no-one has argued more consistently than the NF against British involvement in the Iraq war) but there is a time and a place, and they made sure they caused as much offence as possible...not just to the soldiers but to their families and any true British patriot.

By openly abusing our troops,protestrs- most of whom, ironically, live on state handouts- are not only showing grotesque ingratitude to the men & women who upon their freedom depends, but are also showing complete hatred to the nation itself.
Any rational person with half a brain would realise that it is not the troops fault that Britain is involved in the Iraq war; the war isn't their making, they didn't want to be sent to Basra.
These troops were just doing their job, and then they came home to insults from Muslims who were nothing but hypocrites , that willingly accept this nation, our hospitality and abuse our generosity. Hopefully this demonstration will wake up our fellow Britons to the real threat which Islam poses on Britain.

These same people who abused our troops are the same kind of people that our Labour Gov't spent a staggering £90 million on, under the illusion of diverting young muslims from violent actions...yeah, that worked.

That money would have been much better spent on deporting these scummy muslims from our once pleasant country.

This protest speaks volumes about the way tax payers money is being wasted, the hopeless inadequacy of half-baked "official" policies and the damage that has been
caused by Labour's obsession with forcing multi-culturalism upon us.

There have been "moderate" muslims on numerous mainstream TV news programmes that have said that this protest was unplanned and they didn't think about the implications of their actions, However, the meticulously printed slogans show that this was no spontaneous erruption of anger. No-one in their right mind could possibly say that it wasn't planned for maximum impact.
They have such contempt for our British values that they can be considered a threat- haven't we learnt anything from the London bombings? It doesn't take many to cause mayhem, bloodshed & tragedy.

"Extremist" muslims are hypocrites- they despise democracy and free speech, yet they freely exploit both to prommote their evil religion. They love to claim to be oppressed by the British state, yet they relied on the state for protection when they were verbally attacking our troops.

You would have thought that a British Gov't would act on such a threat accordingly, but if one examines the way in which the "lib-lab-con" coalition put it, it paints a picture that anti-british attacks are actively encouraged .
For instance, s council such as Tower Hamlets could award a grant to the Cordoba Foundation, which is an Islamic pressure group that offered a platform to Hizb-ut-tahrir, who are an organisation that promote the Islamic belief that democracy is incomatible with Islam.
If people such as Home Secretary Jacqui Smith and community secretary favour the ranting troublemakers such as Abu Hamza at the expense of the tax payer, doesn't that send the message that the Gov't are working against us???

I mean, come on, How many more millions has to be spent before we realise that we are contributing to our own ruin?
For far too long, incompetant Gov'ts have given a platform to Islamic preachers of hate; and to this day, we as a nation are still paying the price for that treachery, as sheiks in beards in robes pedal their poionous message.

We need to stop sucking up to Islam and start looking after our own interests.


STOP IMMIGRATION, START REPATRIATION- VOTE NATIONAL FRONT.

UP AND COMING DEMO'S IN SWINDON

I have asked permission to hold two Demostrations this year. For July i have asked to hold an Anti-Paedophile Demo, which will likely be the earlier part of July. And For August i have asked permission to hold an Anti- Gay Demo.

For more information on these demostrations than feel free to leave a comment with your contact details or contact me on 07748103498.

I haven't really had chance to post any thing for a while, due to lack of internet access, however, i will be posting at least once a week from now on....

WHY BRITISH NATIONALISM?

This video explains it all........

The betrayal of the British Public

This, i am afraid to tell you is what the British electorate has subjected us to, when you vote for those vile creatures currently in Government, this is what you get! The above shows how the British Government are selling White, British Jobs on the cheap to the world, importing unwanted guests who cause social problems such as racial tensions, social discord, and anti-white racism. Read the above and then tell me that New-Labour are looking out for the British people.......

RACE AND CRIME: THE FACTS!

There seems to be a huge miss understanding when it comes to the subject of crime, and how race does in fact play a huge factor. Those on the left and in the pc media like to paint a picture of the white man as being the one who commits the majority of crime to install a sense of guilt in our people and to make them submissive to their plan of breeding out the white race by the continuation of non-European immigration to Britain.

There are statistics galore to prove that in fact non-whites are more criminally active than white people. For instance, according to the document Statistics on Race and Crime and the Criminal System produced by the Home Office in 2002, in the 3 year period, mid- 1999 to mid- 2002, a black person was 68 times more likely to kill a white person in Britain than vice versa.... Bare in mind that these figures were compiled before 3 Asians and a Jamaican slaughtered 52 people in July 2005.

What a different picture that paints from what the biased media and the socialists love to claim. They love to make us out to be the violent racists who attack non-whites at any given opportunity, however as these figures indicate, they are more likely to attack us, and when they do attack us it never is reported as it should be.... A RACIST ATTACK... when a white attacks a non-white its always a racist attack, when a non-white attacks a white its always a random attack, or so those in power and the socialists love to claim. Take the case of Henry Webster who was attacked at school grounds in Wroughton, just outside Swindon, by a group of lads who called themselves the Asian Invasion. Their name itself shows that they have racial intentions and then they attack Mr Webster with Weapons and is called a random attack, and anyone who even attempts to label it as racially motivated must be a bigot and ignorant since we all know that non-whites cant be racist..... Right?

And it isn’t just racist crime... A 2007 police report on London's gang culture identified 169 separate gangs and almost half of these had committed serious assaults and more than a quarter had been involved in murder, the largest number of gangs were in the areas which had an abundance of non-whites, the report also states that most of the gang members were black, with Asians coming in at a close second..... These are the people that our Government and Liberals claim to enrich our society, the race hate laws are there to protect these people, from us the law-abiding Britons....

So they dominate the gang culture and they are more likely to murder us than the other way round, and they are the victims of racial hatred? I don’t think so.
These are the people which the Government you voted for and successive Governments have allowed to invade our countries, they are hell bent on "integrating" these people into our society. There is a slight problem with the assumption that those who come from rather un-civilised countries and countries plagued with violence and corruption will come to our countries and automatically become civil and peaceful..... Some do no doubt, however if all you know is violence and corruption and than that is how you will act, and that is how these non-whites act, they act the way that they know... Violent....Like in January 2004, according to the BBC, 59% of rapists were white and 69% of the rapists were black... considering they only ( for now) amount to about 17% of the population, when put into proportion, it is very alarming.

Chief Superintendent Eric Hewlitt stated that Asians committed 90 out of 125 racial attacks in Oldham involving physical injury during 1997, and of the 64,100 reported being attacked in 1997, the vast majority of the muggers were non-white.

Now can someone please explain how since the white Briton constitutes almost 80% of the population, that in relation to non-whites they commit less crime and are less violent, yet the media are all to quick to label whites as the violent racists. We, my fellow country men, are being attacked left right and centre, both physically and through slander by the political correct media. No one in authority is on our side, they are traitors and only look after the interests of the minority, even to the extent that they cover up racial attacks on our people so that the minority don’t look so bad and the natives will be more accepting of the invaders, while they do this they blacken the name of the white man, drag it through the dirt, until whites start feeling guilty of their own and start also working for the interest of the invader....... we must stop this brainwashing being instigated by the traitors in both government and the media, we must wake our fellow country men and women up from their alien induced sleep and get them to start to work for the interests of their own people. The time for action is now, become active.... Vote for the one true British Nationalist Party left in Britain...... NATIONAL FRONT..... Putting Britain First Since 1967.

STOP HARMING OUR CHILDREN!!!

At one point, a few years ago, I remember the controversy over the adverse effects of the MMR vaccine, how everyone seemed worried…. Now the media can’t do enough to tell us of the benefits…
The question has to be asked… has the MMR vaccine been found to be safe, where the adverse effects falsehoods? What has happened to the public uproar, why has peoples views changed so dramatically?
The truth is this folks, the MMR has been proved to have the grave potential to cause; atypical measles, diabetes, mellitus, arthritis, encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, Guillain- Barre syndrome and even death. All these symptoms and no fewer than a further 55 adverse reactions are included in the manufactures vaccine package insert.
Now, there is no way in hell that the British government doesn’t know of these effects, but have just ignored them, and that amounts to treachery, and the fact that the government haven’t even evaluated the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history. They know off the effects, but because they backed it in the first place they are not willing to back track and to admit they where wrong, ( I do have a feeling it may be a bit more sinister) so they risk the lives of British children so they can save face…. This is what you have brought on your people by voting for these low-life’s.
Another vaccine of which I am very much concerned about is the vaccinating girls against cervical cancer. This is very much a vaccine which really needs a good re-think , because not even the manufactures know of the long term effects, let alone how the hundred other HPV viruses that exist will react when the few targeted by this vaccine ( Cervarix) has been naturalised.
Why don’t we at least follow the Americans. Over there the approval for the vaccine has been withheld by the American Food and Drugs Administration pending investigation… For once they seem to be doing the right thing.
Why are we going ahead with this national programme when the FDA are not satisfied? Did the Swindon PCT know about this? Where the parents informed?
Another concern about this vaccine is the aluminium hydroxide in the vaccine. The corrupt government and media have withheld the fact that the vaccine is so neurotoxin that the American Academy of Paediatrics has acknowledged it is “ implicated as interfering with cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system”. I wonder how many parents where made aware of this worrying fact before they gave their consent. Very few I imagine.
I have studied intently what the Government has been doing since I became politically and racially aware when I was 15, and I have found some rather alarming stats, and have seen our government turn the NHS into a killing machine which aides the state sanctioned Genocide Programme. I don’t think these vaccines are there to help when you consider the evidence, there is little reason if any to allow these vaccines.

NANNY STATE AND THE “X- FACTOR” GENERATION!

Day after day, you look around, you read the paper, watch the news, and it all is telling you one thing… This country has gone to the dogs!

I know this isn’t a nice thought, and maybe you think I am being pessimistic in my view of contemporary Britain, however, when one looks at the state of our educational system, streets, our financial system ect ect, it does paint a rather desperate situation.

I have noticed that in recent years that the old traditional British ethos has shifted and the average child’s mentality- thanks to such programs as X-factor and the pathetic education system- we have children that are starting to believe success depends on image and appearance. Many pupils are failing to take responsibility for their own mistakes because of the growing nanny state created by both Conservative and Labour governments which teaches children that everyone else is to blame but themselves.

Britain has witnessed a huge decline in good, traditional, true British values You know, once upon a time this country had a work ethic, but now for the most part, the youth just want success which is grabbed out of the air, which they witness through programs such as X-Factor.

Thanks to this government nannying our youth, it has created a nation of buck passers and deterring individuals who feel that they have no responsibility over their failings, this generation has been nurtured on a weak-kneed government, legislation that shifts personal responsibilities and finger wagging admonition .

The risk we face is future generations is that they will be childishly self-indulgent, where everything is someone else’s fault… basically you will get a toddler mentality in adults.

Here at the National Front, we offer your children nothing better than a genuine future that will return meaning, pride, manners, dignity, moral values, true careers and real substance to their lives, while the government of today offer them nothing but dead ends and lost hopes. Britain has descended in to a bleak and fractured society without a sense of belonging or any shared values- which is the foundation of real communities… and this is what the National Front will bring back to Britain, Community spirit, pride, and true meaning back to being British….

House hold waste collection

Every sane person, no matter where in the world they reside, wants to live in an environment that is both healthy and beautiful.
Many of Swindon’s residents have been conned by Swindon Borough Council- which is run by the Conservatives- to believe that the new system of collecting recyclables and household waste, which came into effect on June 2007 was about helping the environment. This change meant that traditional rubbish collection came to an end, and bin men only came every 2 weeks to collect household waste.
Obviously these Byzantine rules are not restricted to just Swindon, the whole of Britain, under New-Labour, has taken the simple task of rubbish collection and morphed into an unnecessary complicated and draconian regime, which has only lead to an upsurge in fly-tipping and an urban plague of rats, mice, flies and foxes feasting on your two week old rubbish. These rules have been put into place because ministers seized on ridiculous European Landfill targets as a weapon to reduce public services, raise taxes and to impose heavy fines. And remember it was David Miliband, currently putting himself forward as the saviour of the Nation who pushed for the notion of scrapping the weekly waste collection.
What beggars belief is that where we used to have sanitation departments, we know have overpaid supernumeraries like Lee Marshal sitting on grand committees presiding over ludicrous recycling strategies while blatantly and deliberately neglecting the simple task of emptying the rubbish- it isn’t rocket science!
What really is mind blowing is that no one with an ounce of authority seems able to grasp the basic duty to the people who pay their wages. They are hired pure and simply to pick up the rubbish at a minimum of once a week, what happens to it after that is down to them. But, they don’t care what happens to it after that, that’s not what they are about, all they care about is bullying, taxing, and fining people to show them whose boss.
I mean do you really believe that nonsense of us purposely sorting our rubbish into different categories actually makes a difference. Most of it gets chucked onto barges and shipped to China anyway.
We are living under a system gone mad. Can you believe that local councils now actually hire people to cut open your rubbish and check that you haven’t put anything untoward in your bins? And if that wasn’t insane enough, they now use anti-terrorist laws to persecute innocent old ladies who mistakenly place a cornflakes packet in a box intended for newspapers. Back in September there was a case where a guy called the old bill out because he saw two men climb into his garden with a step ladder. The guy thought he was being robbed, but it turned out these 2 men where council officials checking for non-regulation rubbish bins.
We no longer live in a democracy, instead we live in a state which is governed by self-righteous pigs like Lee Marshell, who use the bull**** about polar bears as an excuse to throw their weight around and to try and bring some meaning to their worthless existence.
And if all that wasn’t enough to make your blood boil, the west County, local authorities have started telling people what they can and cant eat to help cut down their household waste. They want us to buy products that do not have packaging… you try and do that next time you go to your local shop.
At the end of the day it is none of their god damned business what we eat, all they should be concerned with is collecting our rubbish and doing with it what they will. That is what we pay them for.
BRING BACK TRADITIONAL RUBBISH COLLECTION- VOTE NATIONAL FRONT