INDEFENSIBLE: SOLDIERS LACK EQUIPMENT WHILE PEN PUSHERS RECEIVE £300 MILLION IN BONUSES.

As British soldiers die in Afghanistan because of lack of equipment, the civil servants who are responsible have received £300 million in bonuses.

These pen pushers have seen “good performance” payments double. They won extra cash for hitting targets for enforcing the multicultural agenda and improving health and safety within their department.

Let me put this in prospective for a second. There is a case of two Mandarins who have received £17,000 each, this is more than a year’s basic pay for a soldier risking his life in Helmand. This is insane. While these civil servants are getting overly generous bonuses, soldiers on the battlefield of Iraq and Afghanistan are screaming out to the Government to stop putting their lives at risk, who have scrimped on military essentials including telescopes, radios and night goggles.

I can tell you this for nothing, that when I first heard about this it made my blood boil. While it is no secret that I believe that our troops should be pulled out of this needless war, and should only be used for British interests, I also believe that while our boys are over their they should be equipped to the hilt. This money could have been used to refit six desperately needed Chinook Troop Carrying Helicopters, which have been confined to their hangers and have been there since 2001 after a massive MoD contact blunder.

Shaun Rusling, Vice chairman of the National Gulf Veterans and Families Association said last night:

“This is disgusting, the sums beggar belief. Surely the government can see it would be better to spend this money on kit for our troops rather than lining the pockets of bureaucrats.”

Lets again look at the figures. The lowest paid private in Afghanistan is paid £16,681 on basic pay. Some 13,000 troops are paid less than £17,000 for risking their lives while those two mandarins got £17,000 bonus for doing a little office work.

I think this is a massive kick in the teeth for our soldiers.

There is no justification for such huge payouts, while our troops die because lack of funding to buy equipment. Even if the MoD was run efficiently, which it isn’t, people would still question why these pen pushers are receiving ridiculously high bonuses.

Lets be honest, its not like these guys need the extra money- they work in an overstaffed ministry, whose 89,000 employers enjoy extremely handsome salaries and enviable job security and pension rights…. Oh, and MoD is well known for being the worst run ministry in Whitehall.

There has been report after report condemning these parasites- I mean bureaucrats- for putting soldiers lives at risk by presiding over huge cost cutting overruns and endless delays in procuring equipment.

These parasites- sorry, I mean bureaucrats- no way in hell deserve this money… they have fought tooth and nail to cut compensation to soldiers hideously wounded in Afghanistan, often because of lack of equipment.

BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW< AND KICK OUT THE TRAITORS IN WHITHALL.

AND SO THE DIRTY TATICS BEGIN: POLICE TRY EVERYTHING TO STOP OUR DEMO

Yesterday I had the pleasure of going to the police station at Gable Cross, Swindon. The reason for those was to go over the proposals for the Anti-Gay Pride demo on the 15th. Or at least that is what they leadme to believe.

The minute I walked into the interview room, it was obvious that they didn’t invite me there to discuss the 15th, but rather to try and put me off holding the demo. They first said that the banner I hope to have at the demo would be in breach of the Public Order Act, and we would be arrested if we were to display it. However, they soon backed down when I revealed that I held banner no more than 2 weeks previous at the anti-Gay pride demo in London, and we faced no objection.

They continued to bang about how they object and would stop me holding the demo if they could.

I know that that was the first of their tactics. This will be the first of many attempts to stop us spreading our message. They did this last year, and they succeeded in pushing our demo into some back street, out of the view of the public. We will not let this happen this year.

If you can make it to this demonstration, please contact me on 07890802883 or email me on Swindon@yahoo.co.uk

Mike

FRENCH POLICE HAVE BEEN OPERATING ON BRITISH SOIL

I have found this article which is of interest to all British patriots. The article is written by Tom Linden.

When were we the British people asked if we wanted to allow French Police to operate on our soil?
Who decided that or sovereignty should be over ridden by a foreign law and its officers.
All Euro Star trains have at least two seats that take ‘handcuffs’, this is because even if you are in the UK, standing in Kent you can be arrested for breaking French law and taken to France to stand trial.
You will see these foreign law officers as you head for the ticket offices as you must drive past their control barrier where you will see their French police cars and customs cars parked up, yes parked up within the port of Dover.
According to a British customs officer when asked by me what they could do if I just drove through without stopping, he replied they could actually ‘shoot’ you for not stopping.
Who gave foreign police officers the right to carry weapons on British soil and believe that they have the right to gun-down our citizens for driving past them?
The next time I am in Dover I will test their response by asking them to provide me with their authorization to operate on British soil.
Below is a link proving this treasonous state of affairs is in operation.

http://www.ambafrance-uk.org/Franco-British-summit-Illegal.html

Tom Linden.

THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION AND YOU

There is an endless list of why Britain should cut all ties with the European Parliament. If Britain doesn’t, then the British people will loose their sovereignty. The fact that the EU is doing everything in its power to force the sinister European Constitution onto the British public is a clear sign of the EU’s ambition of becoming a Superstate, in which they wish Britain to be a part of. We must resist this tyrannical, foreign body, otherwise we will become a mere state in the United States of Europe, and have no control over our nation.

The European Constitution will only have adverse effects for Britain. I have outlined a few of the issues that we would face under European rule.

1. The European Constitution would make it harder to fight crime.

The Constitutional Treaty would give the EU considerable power over crime, policing and our Law Courts. This sinister treaty would mean that that EU judges would gain power over justice and policing. Under the constitution, the European Court of Justice would become the highest court in the land and would also mean that a substantial amount of Britain’s laws would be created in Brussels; which is a huge transfer of our national sovereignty, as the government have admitted.

Under EU law, it would become illegal to try someone twice for the same crime. This would mean that criminals like Billy Dunlop would be walking the streets. In case you didn’t know; Billy Dunlop was successfully convicted of murdering Julie Hogg when new evidence came to light 15 years after he was acquitted.

The Constitutional Treaty also states that the severity of penalties should not be disproportionate to the criminal offence. This would undermine the discretion of British judges to keep infamous killers like Rosemary West in prison for life.

The treaty would allow the EU police force, Europol, to conduct investigations on British soil. This has worrying implications, because unlike the British police forces, Europol officers are largely unaccountable. They are completely immune to prosecution for acts performed in the course of their duties, and they are also not compelled to testify in court. Europol also has its own problems with fraud, for example, its offices were raided by Belgium police as part of a fraud investigation.

The European Prosecutor Eurojust, will also get sweeping new powers. A spokesman for Eurojust- Johannes Thuy- confirmed that “ we would compel the British police to make a prosecution.”

2. The European Constitution would give the EU power over our foreign policy and defence.

If the constitution does get accepted, it would mean that there will be an EU foreign Minister, an EU Diplomatic Service, and the constitution would give the right to the EU to sign treaties on our behalf.

The Spanish Prime Minister, Jose Zapatero, predicts that “ we will undoubtedly see European embassies in the world, not ones from each country, with European diplomats and a European foreign service. We will see Europe with a single voice in security matters. We will have a single voice within NATO”. At first the British Government opposed many of these proposals, but being weak kneed it soon gave in.

The Constitutional Treaty also would set up a “structured cooperation” group, in which the UK will be forced to be apart of. The treaty states that members would have to achieve “ approved objectives concerning the level of investment expenditure on defence equipment and bring their defence apparatus into line with each other”. In a European Federalists research paper they noted that “Structured Co-operation in the field of defence is a significant step toward a Single European Army”.
German Chancellor Angela Merkal has also expressed a want for a single European Army: “ Within the EU itself, we will have to move closer to establishing a common European army”.

Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi has said “ When I was talking about the European army, I was not joking. If you don’t want to call it a European army, don’t call it a European army. You can call it “Margaret”, you can call it “Mary Anne”, you can call it any name”.

The Spanish Prime Minister Jose Zapatero said that “ Europe must believe that it can be in 20 years the most important world power! The constitution is an important step in this direction”.

What all this means in practice is that while our troops are being undermined in Afghanistan and Iraq with poor equipment and a want for just the basic equipment, the EU wants to divert billions of pounds to wasteful projects such as the Galileo satellite System- all because of its desire to play the role of world “Superpower”. Put aside the fact that our troops should not even be in Afghanistan or Iraq, the above is bad for our armed forces.

3. The Constitution would mean that we would have less control over Asylum Seekers and immigrants.

Under the Constitution Treaty, the European Court of Justice would gain a considerably amount of new powers to determine the “rights” of Asylum seekers and immigrants to reside in Britain. The Government have admitted that with the introduction of the Constitution Treaty would come more expensive Asylum and immigration appeals. In November 2006 Geoff Hoon said: “There is clearly a risk that adding what is in effect an avenue of appeal at a very early stage in the process might be an opportunity of further complicating of further complicating our existing asylum and immigration processes.”

The Charter of Fundamental Right, which is legally binding under the sinister constitution, would mean that Britain would not be able to deport terror suspects and other foreign criminals. This would mean, on top of all the other immigrants draining tax payers money away, we would have to pay for these criminals, and we would have to subsidize asylum seekers who are waiting for their case to be heard. It currently takes two years before the European Court of Justice even begins to hear an appeal.

Under the constitution there will be a new “burden sharing” requirement, which means that British taxpayers, who are already burdened with immigrants, will have to pay for immigrants in other countries.

Noone can disagree that under the Constitutional Treaty the European Court of Justice would end up making what is essentially political decisions. It wouldn’t matter if the entire British public disagreed with what the EU were doing, it would be impossible to overturn the rulings.

4. The Constitutional Treaty would mean the EU had more control over our public services.

HEALTH AND EDUCATION
The Constitutional treaty means that the EU would have complete control over the British Health service, and the British people would have no right to reject legislation in this area. This would mean that the EU would regulate medical standards. A new “right to preventive healthcare2 would open the NHS up to influx of costly ambulance-chasing lawsuits. The constitution would end the right to reject legislation concerning trade agreements in public services like health and education. In other words, our Parliament would no longer have a say over deals which will determine how these services are managed.

TRANSPORT: Under the constitution, the British people would loss the right to reject legislation concerning transport. Jacques Barrot, EU Transport Commissioner, recently revealed that the EU wants to run EU wide road pricing operations, but as the AA point out, this would lead to a huge loss of privacy.

The above is only a few of the issues that Britain face if the UK accepts the wretched Constitutional Treaty, and in doing so accept the tyrannical rule of the European Union. Below I have outlined some of the policies of the National front which relate to the above issues.

European Union.

The National Front supports the right of self-determination for all European nations and demands that right for Britain. It seeks a Europe where each nation is friendly to all others but where no nation seeks to dominate or interfere in the affairs of another. Consequently the NF would withdraw Britain from the European Union.
The NF would encourage the development of cultural and sporting links between other European nations. It would encourage the cultural diversity between the nations of Europe and resist attempts to eliminate this. It totally opposes the monetary and political merging of the separate nations into a super-state.

Defence
The protection of the British people at home and throughout the world is the responsibility of the government. It is for this purpose (and this purpose alone) that we require our armed forces, which have such a proud record in defending our nation. No British politician wants a war but it is a sad fact that Britain must always be prepared for a whole range of eventualities including the less likely ones. This is particularly true when the Middle East is in a period of change and uncertainty.

There is no realistic defence without a basic defence strategy. The National Front's defence strategy is that Britain must maintain a defence capability able to inflict massive damage on any other countries in the world should they act as an aggressor. The only other requirement is the ability of our forces to defeat any internal terrorist threat. The equipment with which our forces are armed must be designed and built in the UK and must remain solely under the control of this country.

The National Front totally opposes the use of British troops by the United Nations to carry out their political adventures. It also opposes any attempt to form a European army under foreign control and will withdraw Britain from NATO.

Race and immigration
The National Front believes that the world contains a rich diversity of races and consequent cultures. We believe in the preservation of these races. As each race has evolved it has developed its own social structures, its own customs and its own culture. These are different for each race and have been built up to suit the character of each separate race.

In the case of Britain the National Front upholds the wish of the majority of British people for Britain to remain a white country, with customs and a culture which have been developed to suit our character. Consequently the National Front would halt all non-white immigration into Britain and introduce a policy of phased and humane repatriation of all coloured people currently resident here. Such a policy would be expected to extend over 10-15 years and its completion would thus depend on the recurrent election of successive NF governments.

The National Front believes that this is the only way to halt the steadily rising racial tension and violence that is becoming part of everyday life in modern Britain.

In regards to white immigration, this would only be allowed where there are particular reasons such as the possession of particular skills or in the case of political refugees. Until the problem of unemployment is solved, the NF would seek to keep such immigration to a minimum

NHS
The National Front would provide an entirely free National Health Service and this would include the abolition of prescription charges. When people fall ill they are likely to be losing money in any case and we can see no justification in prescription charges. However, checks on doctors' prescriptions would be made to make sure the Health Service is not wasting money.

Whilst the NF expects all parts of the NHS to use money efficiently and carefully, a National Front government would make available sufficient funds to eliminate all waiting lists for medically needed operations and treatments. This will take priority over other items of expenditure.

The National Front believes that the NHS should be made available to all foreign visitors who fall ill during their stay, however this system is being abused by people who arrive in this country fully aware of an existing health condition - this would be stopped. The NF is opposed to abortion on principle and would only sanction one where a mother has conceived as a result of rape, where medical opinion asserts that there is a genuine and serious danger to the health or life of the mother if the pregnancy is allowed to continue, or where medical opinion asserts that the foetus is seriously damaged or malformed. All such abortions are dependent on the mother's consent. Under a National Front government the days of abortion being used as a form of post-coital contraception will end.

FREEDOM
For the last thousand years the British people have fought, and sometimes died, to preserve our basic freedoms. The National Front wholeheartedly believes that these freedoms must be maintained. Consequently the National Front believes in the introduction of a bill of rights to guarantee basic freedoms including:

Equal and free access to justice
Freedom of speech and publication and distribution of printed matter
Freedom of access to publicly owned assembly facilities
Freedom for orderly demonstrations in public
The right to vote and stand for election for public office without onerous financial or other qualifications
Freedom from arbitrary arrest

Those are a few of our policies which I think are relevant here.

Moving on.

WHAT WILL THE SWINDON NF DO TO HELP STOP THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION BEING ACCEPTED IN BRITAIN.
The National Front, up and down the country, will continue to campaign against EU dictatorship in Britain. However on a local level I have started a campaign. Its an attempt to make central Government stick to their promise and give the British people a referendum. And everyone of you can help. In actual fact, I need everyone of you to help. Whether you live in Swindon or not, it doesn’t matter. As long as you have a voice than you can help.

Basically, I have found a way in which to bring about a referendum in a Parish council which poses the question: “ should there be a national referendum on Britain’s membership in the EU?” More Councils- district councils, parish councils ect- that hold a referendum and with more “yes” votes, the more likely that Brown will hold a referendum.

I will give anyone who is willing to try and make a difference all the guidance and advice they will need- everything from lists of legislation that gives them the right to hold a referendum, to how you can insure you will get a good turn out.

If you are interested please email me at Swindon@yahoo.co.uk, and we will win this fight together.

BRITAIN FIRST- VOTE NATIONAL FRONT

REPORT REVEALES THAT BIG BROTHER HAS FAILED: CCTV HAS DONE VIRTUALLY NOTHING TO CUT CRIME

A report done by Cambridge University academic David Farrington for the Campbell Collaboration Study Group and funded by the Home Office, has found that the millions of CCTV cameras on Britain’s streets has down virtually nothing to cut crime.

Lib-Lab-Con’s big brother society in which has seen cameras going up in town centres, housing estates and on public transport, has not had any significant effect on cutting crime. They had promised that CCTV was for our protection and to help prevent crime, but as the report reveals, it has had no effect.

With this in mind, ask yourself this question; what is the point in CCTV cameras if they do not prevent crime? And what should replace cameras to truly prevent crime?

We here at the National Front believe that true Community policing is the way forward to tackling crime. This would mean that we would bring police officers back on to Britain’s streets, with a zero tolerance policy towards anti-social behaviour, and illegal drug use. We would scrap the useless PCSO’s who have no powers whatsoever, and are nothing but the laughing stock of the community as yobs run rings around them at YOUR expense. The Government go on about being tough on crime, however, since 1997, Britain has become a haven for criminals. Crime has risen, even though that 4.2 million CCTV cameras have been installed at the expense of £500 million of Taxpayer’s money.

This surveillance society has been put in place to watch the public not protect it. Put a stop to Big Brother by joining the National Front, the only party fighting for your FREEDOM

THE UK WILL HAVE TO BUILD A HOUSE EVERY SIX MINUTES TO KEEP UP WITH IMMIGRATION

An ex-Labour Minister claimed last week that the UK would have to build a house every six seconds around the clock for 20 years to keep up with the influx of immigrants. The former Welfare Minister, Frank Field, said that 70 percent of population growth in that 20 year time frame would be down to the influx of non-Britons. This amounts to 7 million people- or to but it in a different perspective, that is 7 new Birmingham’s.

Its not often that someone from Labour actually give the facts about immigration. And it is a very rare occasion that I agree with someone from Labour, but, I do agree with Frank when he said that the only losers are the indigenous Britons. And, its time that the British people woke the hell up to the current situation that Britain finds itself in. We are running out of time. It has been predicted that within the next hundred years that the native, white, British People will be a minority in their own country.

When we reach a situation that 40 percent of all houses built in Britain over the last decade have been given to immigrants-is official statistics suggest- then we must start to realise that we are losing our country..

Nearly 600,000 properties have been needed to house immigrants since 1997- an average of 66,000 each year from 1997 to 2005 ( the latest year figures are available)- making it a grand total of 592,000 homes. And experts say that this number would have risen since 2005 due to mass eastern European immigration.

We wouldn’t need to build so many houses- 40 percent less. We need to preserve our pleasant green land, we are a small country, we limited space, we cannot keep building, because, not before too long, we will have run out of space, and then what. Vote National Front, and insure that our children and our grand children have a land to live off. WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTANCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR WHITE CHILDREN.

THE TRUE COST OF BRITAIN BEING IN THE EU….. 10% OF UK GDP, THAT’S ENOUGH TO ABOLISH INCOME TAX FOR A YEAR.

It has been revealed that the European Union costs the UK economy ten per cent of its Gross Domestic Product, or £148.2billion- Which would be enough to either abolish income tax for a year or cut the national debt by 24 per cent. I haven’t just plucked these figures out from the top of my head. These figures were released last week in a new report on the costs of EU regulation issued by the respected think tank Open Europe.

The study found that 72 per cent of the cost of regulation in the UK stems from EU legislation- basically, the EU regulations which have been introduced over the last 10 years has cost the UK economy almost £107 billion.

Open Europe is a London based think tank which was set up by British business men and women who campaign for reform in the European Union. It has some prominent supporters such as, Lord Leach of Fairford ( he is Open Europe’s chairman.); Derek Scott ( deputy chairman) who was economics advisor to Tony Blair and is currently a visiting professor at London’s Cass Business School; Michael Spencer. He founded and is currently Chief Executive of Icap, the world’s largest interdealer broker; and Simon Wolfson, who is Chief Executive of Next..

The 71 page report measured a decade of the cost that EU regulation has inflicted on Britain since the British government introduced a system of regulatory “Impact Assessments”.

Open Europe used information derived from well over 2,000 of these Impact Assessments, and the following is its conclusions:

Over the ten years, the amount of laws being made in both Whitehall and Brussels has risen dramatically. Open Europe found that the amount of legal acts in force in the EU has risen from 10,800 in 1998 to over 26,000 in 2008. As Open Europe pointed out; the number of regulations adopted each and every year points out the trends, however, they point out that more importantly is the actual cost to the economy.

In 2005, the UK launched its “Regulatory Reform Agenda“; and since then the cost of regulation has risen from £16.5 billion in 2005 to a staggering £28.7 billion in 2008- which means an enormous increase of 74 per cent. Also, the cumulative cost of regulations introduced into Britain between 1998 and 2005 is a jaw-dropping £148.2billion, which, as stated above, is an equivalent to 10 per cent of GDP. This is mental. How can any government allow such wastes. With that £148.2 billion, the British government could abolish income tax, or help get Britain out of debt, cause that staggering amount could pay off 24 per cent off the national debt. All that money lost because of our membership to the tyrannical EU.

According to the report, if current regulation trends continue, by 2018, the cost of EU regulation since 1998 would amount to more than £356 billion. This is about £14,300 per British household. And again, for this insanely high amount, the government could abolish income tax for two years and still have a hell of a lot left over, or they could pay off 60 per cent of this nations debt.

EU labour laws account for a total of 24 per cent of UK’s regulation costs. Labour market legislation that has been introduced in the UK in the last 10 years has cost the British economy £45 billion, of which a huge 69 per cent came from the EU- that’s £31billion. This means folks that 21 percent of the total cost of EU regulations in the UK can be traced to the EU’s labour market laws. And the government could of actually done their job and invest public money in a sensible manner- for instance, that £45 billion could cut corporation tax by two thirds.. But instead it gets wasted because of our EU membership.

All the above is just the tip of one hell of an iceberg. I would be here all day if I was to point every single bit of taxpayers money gets wasted because of our governments determination to be apart of the down right tyrannical European Union. We must end this madness, and get the hell out of the EU before its too late.. Join the National Front today, and join the fight for our peoples future…. Don’t let future generations pay for our mistakes.