CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 4 TO BE TAUGHT ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY!

It has emerged that young children as young as 4 will be taught about the imagined “positives” of homosexuality in their Maths, Geography, Science and English lessons.

As part of a government backed drive too “celebrate the gay community” math problems could include gay characters. ( What the hell does homosexuality have to do with maths?) Also in Geography lessons, young and impressionable students will be asked why homosexuals move from the country side to the city- and words like “outing” and “pride” will become more common place in language lessons.

Lets get down to the heart of this… These lesson plans are designed purely to force fed our children the establishments accepted view on homosexuality, in hope that this desensitises the youngsters to homosexuality and therefore them accepting it as a natural life choice. Children as young as 4 will be exposed to images of same sex couples and Looney left wing books like AND TANGO MAKES THREE, which is a ridiculous book about two penguins, who happen to be male and homosexual, bringing up a chick.

There are so many reasons to oppose this scheme.

Firstly, children should be just children. They have no need to be taught about homosexuality. In fact, until they have reached their teens, there is no need for them to know about any kind of sexuality at all, let alone the degeneracy that is homosexuality. Our children’s education is paramount, and to any right thinking parent their child’s education comes before any Political Correct agenda the traitors in Parliament want to impose on our children.

Secondly, the drive to force children to accept homosexuality as normal is a complete waste of resources, and will distract away from the whole point of the educational system; to teach our children, so they can get on in life. Is it any wonder, with these kind of PC agendas constantly being forced into out schools, that British schools are tumbling down in International league tables in Maths, English and Science. These plans are going to be funded by you, the taxpayer (without your consent may I add.) through the education quango the Training and Development Agency for Schools. Good to know, with all these cuts in budgets, and everyone tightening their belts, there is a £35,000 grant available to push forward the pro-homosexual agenda.

And lastly…. lets be honest; what is there to actually celebrate when it comes to homosexuality? Homosexuality has done nothing but cause problems… I can bet you now that the lefty teachers will not teach the children that statistics show that homosexuals die younger; homosexuals suffer mental problems such as depression and psychosis; homosexuals and other sexual deviants are overrepresented in crimes such as mass murder, child seduction and molestation; their unclean sexual habits and ultra-promiscuous lifestyles have resulted in spreading the homosexual plague, AIDS, which not only has killed millions of their own, but also millions of others.

Like I said, what is there to actually celebrate. Should we celebrate the fact that homosexuality is damaging, devolutionary, unhealthy and unaesthetic. Should we celebrate that it leads to disease, maladjustment, suicide and a hell of a lot of other social ills. They can waste all the money they wish to push the idea of homosexuality being normal, but in practice it does nothing to alleviate its damaging effects.

Its about time that common sense ruled the day… Instead of this PC nonsense, we should be making sure that our children are receiving an education to be proud of. Only the National Front offers such a policy of common sense. We don’t see the need to pander to certain groups, because it fashionable or seen as positive to do so… Our children’s education is too important to just throw away to appease a certain minority group.

Swindon Borough Council and the Pro-Paedophile website

After I found out about the NF’s website being blocked, I took it upon myself to have a closer look at the Swindon Library Webfilter, I wanted to know what websites the Swindon Borough Council deemed acceptable and what the deemed unacceptable.

To do this, I searched for all sorts of things on Google, and to be honest, I sincerely wished I didn’t.

One of the websites I found that Swindon Borough Council deem acceptable sickened me to my core. It really did shock me, because I was sure that not even Roderick Bluh and his cronies could sink that low. But by god they did.

The website I am talking about is called Attracted To Children, and yes it is as sick as it sounds. It is a website ran by a group of paedophiles, and they try and put themselves and other paedophiles across as a demonised minority who deserve rights. They openly state their sexual attraction to children.

To illustrate what kind of website I am talking about, let me give a few quotes I found on the site.

1) Paedophilia, a simple sexual and emotional attraction to young children, is often seen as the ultimate evil.
2)I’ve wanted to work with children for a while because I find them sexually attractive.
3) I work with children because society doesn’t want me to, and I will publish a guide to help other non-offending paedophiles ( and possibly also non-contact offenders who are legally allowed to work with children) to do the same.
4) we must work with children in order to counter-indoctrinate them, so that they don’t grow up to have the appalling values of the adults of today.

As you can see, this shouldn’t be a website which should be allowed to be viewed by the public, yet, Mr Bluh doesn’t think so.

The Stop The Bias campaign started off as just to unblock the NF website, but this has now become secondary to a new objective: to get this sick website blocked, and other criminal websites blocked as well.

Please offer your support for this campaign. We will be holding a demonstration in December, outside the Library. Email me at Swindon@yahoo.co.uk

IMMIGRANT BABY BOOM WILL COST YOU £1BN!!

Those amongst the PC crowd and the advocates of our open border policy love to argue about the supposed economic benefits of uncontrolled immigration. Day after day we hear about how migrants are boosting our economy, helping keep taxes down and helping to maintain our public services.

But once again another study has come out to put these ludicrous claims to rest.

A study has revealed that us taxpayers will have to face a soaring bill to pay for extra school places- most of which will be created to accommodate immigrant children.

The study revealed the majority of the £1bn needed will be used to create 96,000 extra school places- 67,000 will be to non-British children. According to the study conducted by Migrationwatch, of the 96,000 increase, more than half of the children will be born to non-British parents- and around a sixth (13,000) will be to children who has one non-British parent. And that leaves British children who will account for 29,000 of the increase.

This study comes out just after it has been revealed that tens of thousands of parents are finding it increasingly difficult to get their children into the school they want because of lack of places thanks to new-Labour’s open door policy.

Migrationwatch’s chairman Sir Andrew Green said- “ this is just one example of the impact of mass immigration on our public services…. An even bigger one is housing, where immigration accounts for 40 per cent of all new households…. This means we will have to build nearly 2,000 houses a WEEK just for new immigrants and their families.”

Ok, lets break this down. The Office for National Statistics revealed that the British population hit the 61million mark for the first time, however, under current trends the British population will hit 70million in the next 25 years. This will mean that our public services will collapse and the public purse will be shot.

It should be obvious that mass immigration is unsustainable, and it is us Brits who will be paying the bill. No one can deny that our public infrastructure is near breaking point and our public services are bursting at the seems under the strain. Thanks to successive governments betraying the British people, Britain is now the second most populated country in the western world.

ITS TIME TO VOTE NATIONAL FRONT, THE ONLY PARTY THAT WILL CLOSE THE OPEN DOOR.

STOP IMMIGRATION NOW!!

PLEASE STOP ABORTION NOW!!!!

I am posting this video on here because it demonstrates the point I made in a post a day or so a go. If you are easily upset, or offended, I advise you not to watch the video due to its confrontational nature.

ARE YOU A "RETARDED HOMOPHOBE"?

On the 13th May, the BAAF insulted a huge chunk of the population who have grave concerns about children’s welfare when they are adopted by gay couples by calling them “Retarded homophobes”.

Apparently, us at the NF and anyone who protests against gay adoption are merely whinging according to the BAAF. For a State funded agency to use foul language against anyone that disagrees with their policies on gay adoption is unacceptable.

Author Patricia Morgon, who has published a study on gay adoption, commented; “ It is disgraceful that they do not wish to discuss the pros and the cons of gay adoption. They just go in for abuse. They don’t appear to be interested in evidence about outcomes for children.”

The state funded agency said in their guide booklet aimed at Gay couples who wish to adopt: “ Most importantly, don’t worry about society… Children need good parents much more that retarded homophobes need an excuse to whinge, so don’t let your worries about society’s reaction hinder your desire and ability to give children a good home.”

There are numerous reasons why homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt. The fact that the homosexual lifestyle is hugely damaging and is not an environment that a child should be brought up in ( click on burning gay pride flag to see Homosexuality Blog post.). But also the child’s instinct is to conform. The certainty with same sex couples adopting a child is that the child will feel uncomfortably set apart from traditional brought up school mates. Studies prove aplenty that children flourish when in a traditional family.

Another consideration is the welfare of the child if placed under the care of homosexuals. Evidence suggest that homosexuals are more likely to molest children…Below I have posted a study done by Paul Cameron, Ph. D. from the Family Research Institute in the USA.




"Ann Landers (1) says the statement "Homosexuals are more inclined to molest children sexually than heterosexuals" is false. The American Psychological Association has sponsored a work that asserts: "Recognized researchers in the field on child abuse,... almost unanimously concur that homosexual people are actually less likely to approach children sexually." (2)
Why is it, then, that we read about sex between boys and men in every newspaper? Does it merely reflect sensationalist journalism? We know that heterosexual molestation also occurs. But since there are so many more heterosexuals than homosexuals, which kind of child molestation – homosexual or heterosexual – is proportionately more common?
The Scientific Evidence
Three kinds of scientific evidence point to the proportion of homosexual molestation: 1) survey reports of molestation in the general population, 2) surveys of those caught and convicted of molestation, and 3) what homosexuals themselves have reported. These three lines of evidence suggest that the 1%-to-3% of adults who practice homosexuality (3) account for between a fifth and a third of all child molestation.
Reports of Molestation by the General Population
In 1983, a probability survey of the sexual experiences of 4,340 adults in 5 U.S. cities found that about 3% of men and 7% of women reported sexual involvement with a man before the age of 134 (i.e., 30% was homosexual).
In 1983- (4), a random survey of 3,132 adults in Los Angeles found that 3.8% of men and 6.8% of women said that they had been sexually assaulted in childhood. Since 93% of the assailants were male, and only 1% of girls had been assaulted by females, about 35% of the assaults were homosexual. (5)
The Los Angeles Times (6) surveyed 2,628 adults across the U.S. in 1985. 27% of the women and 16% of the men claimed to have been sexually molested. Since 7% of the molestations of girls and 93% of the molestations of boys were by adults of the same sex, about 4 of every 10 molestations in this survey were homosexual.
In a random survey of British 15-to-19 yr olds, 35% of the boys and 9% of the girls claimed to have been approached for sex by adult homosexuals and 2% of the boys and 1% of the girls admitted to succumbing. (7)
In science, a review of the professional literature published in a refereed scientific journal is considered to be an accurate summary of the current state of knowledge. The latest such review was published in 1985. (8) It concluded that homosexual acts were involved in 25% to 40% of the cases of child molestation recorded in the scientific and forensic literature.
Surveys of Those Convicted
Drs Freund and Heasman (9) of the Clarke Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto reviewed two sizeable studies and calculated that 34% and 32% of the offenders against children were homosexual. In cases they had personally handled, homosexuals accounted for 36% of their 457 pedophiles.
Dr. Adrian Copeland, a psychiatrist who works with sexual offenders at the Peters Institute in Philadelphia, said (10) that, from his experience, pedophiles tend to be homosexual and "40% to 45%" of child molesters have had "significant homosexual experiences."
Dr. C. H. McGaghy (11) estimated that "homosexual offenders probably constitute about half of molesters who work with children." Other studies are similar:
– Of the approximately 100 child molesters in 1991 at the Massachusetts Treatment Center for Sexually Dangerous Persons, a third were heterosexual, a third bisexual and a third homosexual in orientation. (12)
– A state-wide survey of 161 Vermont adolescents who committed sex offenses in 1984 found that 35 (22%) were homosexual. (13)
– Of the 91 molesters of non-related children at Canada’s Kingston Sexual Behaviour Clinic from 1978-1984, 38 (42%) engaged in homosexuality. (14)
– Of 52 child molesters in Ottawa from 1983 to 1985, 31 (60%) were homosexual. (15)
– In England for 1973, 802 persons (8 females) were convicted of indecent assault on a male, and 3,006 (6 of them female) were convicted of indecent assault on a female (i.e., 21% were homosexual). 88% of male and about 70% of female victims were under age sixteen. (16)
Because of this pattern, Judge J. T. Rees concluded that "the male homosexual naturally seeks the company of the male adolescent, or of the young male adult, in preference to that of the fully-grown man. [In 1947] 986 persons were convicted of homosexual and unnatural offences. Of those, 257 were indictable offences involving 402 male victims.... The great majority of [whom]... were under the age of 16. Only 11%... were over 21."
"[T]he problem of male homosexuality is in essence the problem of the corruption of youth by itself [i.e., by other boys] and by its elders. [And thereby]... the creation... of new addicts ready to corrupt a still further generation of young men and boys in the future." (17)
What Homosexuals Admit
The 1948 Kinsey survey found that 37% of the gays and 2% of the lesbians admitted to sexual relations with under-17-yr-olds, and 28% of the gays and 1% of the lesbians admitted to sexual relations with under-16-yr-olds while they themselves were aged 18 or older. (18)
In 1970 the Kinsey Institute interviewed 565 white gays in San Francisco: 25% of them admitted to having had sex with boys aged 16 or younger while they themselves were at least 21. (19)
In The Gay Report, 23% of the gays and 6% of the lesbians admitted to sexual interaction with youth less than 16 years of age. (20)
In France, 129 convicted gays (21)(average age 34 years) said they had had sexual contact with a total of 11,007 boys (an average of 85 different boys per man). Abel et al reported similarly that men who molested girls outside their family had averaged 20 victims each; those who molested boys averaged 150 victims each. (22)
Summary
About a third of the reports of molestation by the populace have involved homosexuality. Likewise, between a fifth and a third of those who have been caught and/or convicted practiced homosexuality. Finally, a fifth to a third of surveyed gays admitted to child molestation. All-in-all, a rather consistent story.
Teacher-Pupil Sexual Interaction
Nowadays parents are labeled bigots for fearing that homosexual teachers might molest their children. But if homosexuals are more apt to molest children and are in a positon to take advantage of them, this fear makes sense. Indeed, accounts of disproportionate homosexual teacher molestation appear throughout the scientific literature.
The original U.S. Kinsey study reported that 4% of the non-criminal white gays and 7% of the non-criminal white lesbians reported that they had their first homosexual experience with a ‘teacher or other caretaker.’ None of the heterosexuals were recorded as having a teacher as their first sex partner. (18)
In England, Schofield reported that at least 2 of his 150 homosexuals had their first homosexual experience with a teacher and an additional 2 reported that their first homosexual contact with an adult was with a teacher. One of the 50 men in his comparison group had also been seduced by a homosexual teacher, while none of the men interviewed claimed involvement with a heterosexual teacher. (23)
In the 1978 McCall’s magazine study of 1,400 principals, (24) 7% reported complaints about homosexual contact between teachers and pupils and 13% reported complaints about heterosexual contact between teachers and pupils (i.e., 35% of complaints were homosexual). 2% "knew of instances in which teachers discussed their homosexuality in class."
Of 400 consecutive Australian (25) cases of molestation, 7 boys and 4 girls were assaulted by male teachers. Thus 64% of those assaults were homosexual.
In 1987, Dr. Stephen Rubin, associate professor of psychology at Whitman College, conducted a 10 state survey (26) and found 199 sexual abuse cases involving teachers. 122 male teachers had abused female pupils and 14 female teachers had abused male students. In 59 cases, however, male teachers had abused male pupils and in 4 cases female teachers had abused female students (overall 32% were homosexual).
A 1983 survey asked 4,340 adults to report on any sexual advances and any physical sexual contact by elementary and secondary teachers (4% of those who were teachers in the survey claimed to be bisexual or homosexual).4 29% of the advances by elementary and 16% of the advances by secondary school teachers were homosexual. In addition, 1 of 4 (25%) reports of actual sexual contact with an elementary school teacher were homosexual. In high school, 8 (22%) of 37 contacts between teacher and pupil were homosexual. 18% reported having had a homosexual teacher (8% of those over the age of 55 vs 25% of those under 26). Of those reporting a homosexual teacher, 6% said that the teacher influenced them to try homosexuality and 13% of the men and 4% of the women said that the teacher made sexual advances toward them.
Summary
Whether examining surveys of the general populace or counts of those caught, homosexual teachers are disproportionately apt to become sexually involved with children.
Proportionality: The Key
Study after nationwide study (3) has yielded estimates of male homosexuality that range between 1% and 3%. The proportion of lesbians in these studies is almost always lower, usually about half that of gays. So, overall, perhaps 2% of adults regularly indulge in homosexuality. Yet they account for between 20% to 40% of all molestations of children.
Child molestation is not to be taken lightly. Officials at a facility which serves about 1,500 runaway youngsters each year estimate that about half of the boys have been homosexually abused and 90% of the girls heterosexually assaulted. (27) Investigation of those suffering severe chronic mental illness implicates child molestation as a primary cause (45% of Bigras et al’s (28) patients were homosexually abused).
If 2% of the population is responsible for 20% to 40% of something as socially and personally troubling as child molestation, something must be desperately wrong with that 2%. Not every homosexual is a child molester. But enough gays do molest children so that the risk of a homosexual molesting a child is 10 to 20 times greater than that of a heterosexual.
Goals of the Gay Movement
The gay movement is forthright about seeking to legitimize child-adult homosexual sex. In 1987, The Journal of Homosexuality – the scholarly organ of the gay rights movement – published "Pedophilia and the Gay Movement." (29) Author Theo Sandfort detailed homosexual efforts to end "oppression towards pedophilia." In 1980 the largest Dutch gay organization (the COC) "adopted the position that the liberation of pedophilia must be viewed as a gay issue... [and that] ages of consent should therefore be abolished... by acknowledging the affinity between homosexuality and pedophilia, the COC has quite possibly made it easier for homosexual adults to become more sensitive to erotic desires of younger members of their sex, thereby broadening gay identity."
In 1990 COC achieved a significant victory: lowering of the age of consent for homosexual sex in Holland to 12 (unless the parents object, in which case it goes up to 15). (30) In the U.S. and Canada, the North American Man-Boy Love Association marches proudly in many gay pride parades with the stated goal of removing the barriers to man-boy sex. Note the phrases "oppression towards pedophilia" and "liberation of pedophilia." It is clear that those who advocate the legalization of sex between adults and children intend to argue that such conduct is a "civil right," deserving of the same legal protections afforded to other minorities. A large proportion of Americans regard that argument as a mere pretext to giving "sexual predators" free reign to take advantage of vulnerable children.
Conclusion
Not only is the gay rights movement upfront in its desire to legitimize sex with children, but whether indexed by population reports of molestation, pedophile convictions, or teacher-pupil assaults, there is a strong, disproportionate association between child molestation and homosexuality. Ann Landers’ claim that homosexuals molest children at no higher a rate than heterosexuals do is untrue. The assertion by gay leaders and the American Psychological Association that a homosexual is less likely than a heterosexual to molest children is patently false."

The National Front would put an immediate stop to the immoral practice of allowing gay couples to adopt children. We believe that the welfare of the child is more important and should be put before the establishments obsessive need for “equality”.

VOTE NF TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN.

WELCOME TO MODERN BRITAIN

This is Modern Britain. New-Labour with their Social Engineering. Below is an article from the Daily Mail.

A special investigation into a chilling modern phenomenon


A boy stripped naked, battered and left in a makeshift grave. Two little brothers sexually humiliated and tortured in a two-hour ordeal. And the attackers? Young children like themselves. DAVID JONES explores a chilling modern phenomenon...


The two attacks bore chilling similarities and they were carried out on grim Yorkshire council estates less than 30 miles apart. In both cases the victims were young and vulnerable, and an elaborate story was invented to lure them to a secluded place.


In both cases they were stripped, and saw their clothes ritually burnt before they were tortured and savagely beaten.


Most disturbingly of all, however, when police investigated these protracted and gratuitous acts of violence they discovered that the perpetrators were themselves no more than children, their ages ranging from just ten to 14 years old.


One of the attacks, which took place in Leeds - the other happened in nearby Doncaster - involved four children, who attacked a 15-year-old with a mental age of seven.


Such was the savagery of the assault that Judge Kerry Macgill described it in court as 'almost like a scene out of Lord Of The Flies, where children are left to their own devices and do simply appalling things to other children'.


After talking to those involved, I have found this reference to William Golding's disquieting novel, in which a group of schoolboys turn on one another with animalistic savagery after being stranded on a desert island, was no exaggeration.


These two cases come more than 40 years after another North Country child - 11-year-old Mary Bell - was convicted of strangling two little boys aged four and three 'solely for the pleasure and excitement of killing', as the prosecutor phrased it. At the time, a horrified nation vowed that it must never be allowed to happen again.


The same was said in 1993, when Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, two ten-year-old Merseyside boys, abducted and murdered toddler James Bulger while he was out shopping with his mother.


Yet barely a week seems to pass without news of a vicious assault by a young person, and those recent atrocities in Doncaster and Leeds - in which, as we will see, the victims were fortunate to escape with their lives - are only the latest reminder that such brutality is happening again, and with alarming regularity.


Inevitably, this raises disturbing questions. Are attacks by children really increasing, and are we correct to suppose the attackers are using ever more extreme and inventive forms of violence? If so, why?


More pressingly, what social factors are spawning this frightening new generation of potential Bells and Thompsons, and is enough being done to identify them and prevent them from developing into psychopaths?


During this investigation I have examined reams of statistics and reports, and spoken to leading experts, including two of Britain's most eminent adolescent psychiatrists, Professor Susan Bailey and Dr Eileen Vizard, both of whom gave evidence at the Bulger trial.


The picture that emerges is surprising and illuminating. Before we study it, however, we should describe in more detail the two episodes in Yorkshire. For, extreme as they may have been, the background to these incidents appears to form part of an all-too-typical pattern.


As Judge Macgill heard in court last week, the Leeds attack occurred on a sprawling red-brick council estate south of the city, where the four assailants - a girl of 14, two boys aged 11, and another boy of 13 - lived in close proximity to their 15-year-old victim.


Since the attackers all pleaded guilty to attempting to cause grievous bodily harm with intent, the full story was not told in court.


But according to the 14-year-old girl's mother, the attack was conceived after the victim became infatuated with her.


'He stalked her for four months and would not leave her alone, spending hours standing outside her house,' she told me. 'He was constantly texting and telephoning her.'


She claims the attack happened one Sunday evening after the victim sent the 14-year-old girl - a pretty, popular teenager, who had hoped to become a nursery teacher - a particularly lewd message accompanied by a 'pornographic' image of himself.


But even supposing this story to be true - and the victim's mother strongly disputes it - then it surely cannot excuse the calculating manner in which this mentally disabled boy (who attends a special needs school and cannot even tie his own shoelaces) was ensnared, nor the horrific torture inflicted on him.


According to his mother, a 55-year-old who has seven children by several fathers, he was lured to a stretch of waste ground, hidden from the estate by a ring of trees, after the girl asked him to help her look for a mobile phone she had supposedly lost there.


When he arrived, he was grabbed by the gang. They threatened to kill him, stripped him naked, made a bonfire of his shoes and coat, urinated on him, stuck lit cigarettes up his nose, punched and kicked him and lashed him with planks and branches

IS NURSERY IN EUCLID STREET DEVOID OF BRITISH CHILDREN?

I was reading the Swindon Advertiser ( March 19th), and I came across an article about The Children’s Nursery down Euclid Street. The article was about how the children were given a “treat” of learning about an African culture, which is all well and good, however, what was quite disturbing about this article was what Nursery Business Manager Lynn Webb said: “ We have so many children from so many different ethnic origins, we have mixed race, Polish, Indian, Afro- Caribbean and Chinese children.”

Now, I might be making a bigger deal out of these than needs to be made, and if I am, I apologise. However, why doesn’t she acknowledge the white British ethnicity? Or, maybe, the nursery doesn’t have any white British children attending the Nursery? I am not sure if it is the former or the latter, and to be honest, I am not sure which would be worst. If I am completely honest I would say the former would be worst. Because, if the nursery teachers- which for the young children, would be seen as role models and a major part of the process of socialisation- doesn’t acknowledge the British ethnicity as a separate and unique identity, what chance do white, British children have of growing up with pride in who they are and where they come from.

This article in the Swindon Advertiser is just more proof of the liberal establishment ignoring the British identity. Be proud to be British and white. Its time to make a stand. Join the National Front.

STOP HARMING OUR CHILDREN!!!

At one point, a few years ago, I remember the controversy over the adverse effects of the MMR vaccine, how everyone seemed worried…. Now the media can’t do enough to tell us of the benefits…
The question has to be asked… has the MMR vaccine been found to be safe, where the adverse effects falsehoods? What has happened to the public uproar, why has peoples views changed so dramatically?
The truth is this folks, the MMR has been proved to have the grave potential to cause; atypical measles, diabetes, mellitus, arthritis, encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, Guillain- Barre syndrome and even death. All these symptoms and no fewer than a further 55 adverse reactions are included in the manufactures vaccine package insert.
Now, there is no way in hell that the British government doesn’t know of these effects, but have just ignored them, and that amounts to treachery, and the fact that the government haven’t even evaluated the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history. They know off the effects, but because they backed it in the first place they are not willing to back track and to admit they where wrong, ( I do have a feeling it may be a bit more sinister) so they risk the lives of British children so they can save face…. This is what you have brought on your people by voting for these low-life’s.
Another vaccine of which I am very much concerned about is the vaccinating girls against cervical cancer. This is very much a vaccine which really needs a good re-think , because not even the manufactures know of the long term effects, let alone how the hundred other HPV viruses that exist will react when the few targeted by this vaccine ( Cervarix) has been naturalised.
Why don’t we at least follow the Americans. Over there the approval for the vaccine has been withheld by the American Food and Drugs Administration pending investigation… For once they seem to be doing the right thing.
Why are we going ahead with this national programme when the FDA are not satisfied? Did the Swindon PCT know about this? Where the parents informed?
Another concern about this vaccine is the aluminium hydroxide in the vaccine. The corrupt government and media have withheld the fact that the vaccine is so neurotoxin that the American Academy of Paediatrics has acknowledged it is “ implicated as interfering with cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system”. I wonder how many parents where made aware of this worrying fact before they gave their consent. Very few I imagine.
I have studied intently what the Government has been doing since I became politically and racially aware when I was 15, and I have found some rather alarming stats, and have seen our government turn the NHS into a killing machine which aides the state sanctioned Genocide Programme. I don’t think these vaccines are there to help when you consider the evidence, there is little reason if any to allow these vaccines.

Our children deserve more!

In our ever decaying world, our people are being put last time and time again. In every aspect of our society we are being pushed to the side for the benefit of either some minority or for the gain of some greedy authority.

And when i say every aspect i mean every aspect. Our children are not omitted from the vile treatment by those in power. For instance, every local authority can home every non-British un-wanted guest that happens to invade our land, while, as of 2004, over 1 million white children in Britain are homeless or in housing which is either grossly overcrowded or unfit for human habitation.

In Britain our children are being treated with repulsion by our "leaders"- Unicef in Feburary 2007 released a very telling report stating that the uk was the worst place for children to grow up in the developed world.

Family breakdown, the rise in drug abuse and the constant fear of violence has placed British kids 21st out of 21 on the happiness table. Now when you consider the fat cats at the top of the table make Britain the forth wealthiest nation in the world.... it makes you think doesn't it.

The BBC said: " Labour came to power pledging to promote education, education, education and to slash teen pregnancies and risky behaviour of the young. Unicef paints a picture of failure on all fronts." While Robert Whelan of Civitas said: " I have seen the evidence piling up for 20 years that married families are better for children than single parents or step families. The question is how long the Government can close their eyes to this reality"

OH MR WHELAN THEY HAVE SEEN THE EVIDENCE THEY JUST DON'T CARE.

With the rise in child poverty and the constant feeling of alienation the children are becoming depressed, and there are some worring statistics ...... Like 1 in 12 British children self-harm and according to childline some of the children self harming was as young as 7. And, as of April 2005 the Depression Alliance stated that 1 in 5 children were reported as needing help with depression, and a staggering 28% of these thought seriously about suicide. Now the proof of the Governments total disregard for our children is that in September 2004, us experts found that children on the anti-depressant Prozac have a greater chance of attempting suicide, now with this in mind, as of 2004, Prozac is the only anti-depressant allowed to be subscribed to people under 18... What The Hell?????

And we are told by the Health and Social Care Center that child obesity has doubled in the last 10 years which is not surprising when you consider that between 1992 and 2005 more than 40% of England's school and community playing fields were sold and 34,000 sport pitches disappeared under concrete... This is after Labour promised that no more school playing fields will not be sold.... However as of October 2005, 2,540 school playing fields have been sold off.

Our children deserve to be treated better than this. Under the current regime they are treated like dirt. Under a National Front Government they would be treated with care and attention they need to lead happy and healthy life's.