"Truth seldom is pleasant; it is almost invariably bitter. A loss of courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days..." Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Commencement address at Harvard University , June 8, 1978
Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts

Sunday, 5 February 2012

WHY CAN'T FOREIGN PRISONERS BE DEPORTED?

At the cost of the British taxpayer, thousands of European criminals in British jails will not be sent home, despite the introduction of a new prisoner transfer deal among EU member states. The deal, which came into force last month, is designed to allow countries to ease the drastic overcrowding in prisons by deporting offenders back to their native land.

Shamefully, since the agreement was signed in 2008 only two nations have reached a deal with Britain, both of which securing opt-outs from the project. Labour ministers allowed Poland to dodge its obligations for five years while Ireland negotiated a full opt-out.

Because of the incompetence of successive British governments, more than 1,400 Polish and Irish prisoners are serving time in British prisons at our expense. The offenders from these two nations alone amount to a staggering third of all European inmates in the UK.

Both the LIEbour and Lib-CON coalition governments have failed the British people. The Lib-CON coalition have continued to allow foreign prisoners to reside at our expense and have failed miserably to negotiate new deals to transfer prisoners. While LIEbour have landed taxpayers with an unnecessary bill of millions of pounds, the coalition have not taken any steps to correct this issue.

The fact that successive governments can not even deport foreign prisoners who have committed serious crimes is a damning indictment of the flimsy EU arrangements and the weak nature of the mainstream parties.

It is our right not to be landed with unnecessary bills for criminals who have no right to even be on our shores. We need a strong willed government, who will stand up for our interests. There is only one party that has the will-power and determination to stand by the rights of the native British people; that party is none other than the National Front.

STANDING UP FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE NATIVE BRITISH PEOPLE FOR 45 YEARS!!

Tuesday, 24 May 2011

WE NEED 420 NEW SCHOOLS A YEAR TO COPE WITH MIGRANTS


For over 40 years now, the National Front have been warning the people of Britain about the adverse effects of Immigration, especially the idiotic and half baked policy of open-door immigration. Time and time again, we are being proved right.

The school system is on the brink of absolute collapse because of an explosion in pupil numbers which is a direct result from a decade of immigrants pouring over our borders. The analysis of official figures shows that the government will have to build, and YOU the taxpayer will have to pay for, an average of 420 new primary schools a year over the next three years to cope with the extra demand. In total, the new research does suggest, that England will need 1,222 new primaries by 2014 just to cope with the expected explosion in pupil numbers.

This research clearly shows what the actual affects of labour’s and now the coalitions policy towards immigration is having, and what a dramatic impact it is causing. Because of insane immigration policy’s by the traitors in parliament, two thirds of the population growth, which is causing massive strain on public services, is down to immigration; and is putting unbelievable amount of strain on primary schools, and will later put pressure on secondary schools and then housing. Lets be honest here folks: who out there can claim that an extra three million immigrants in a mere 12 years wouldn’t have a massive impact on public services?

Spectator Magazine first published this new research, which used statistics from the Department of Education.

George Bridges, a former adviser to David Cameron, had this to say in an article: that across the country there were “places feeling the blast of a population explosion that our political class seems determined to ignore.” He went on to highlight figures showing that councils in London needed 70,000 more primary schools places over the next four years while in Bristol another 3,000 were needed. “ The tale is the same in Luton, Leeds, Swindon, Poole, Eastbourne, Coventry, Rotherham and Darlington - anywhere you see toddlers queuing for swings, you’ll find a nightmare…. One in eight children born in the past decade had at least one immigrant parent, and every second child in London has an immigrant mother.”

For too long the destructive policies of the mainstream parties have been allowed to destroy our nation. We have to put a stop to it before it gets to late, and our public services collapse under the strain! For our children’s future, we must stand against the traitors and demand the interests of the British people be put first.

The National Front have been campaigning for over 40 years to ensure that British interests are put first. We are the only political party that has consistently looked out for you, the native Brit. We have been campaigning and will continue to campaign to ensure the best for you and your children.

Monday, 24 January 2011

WAKE UP BRITAIN: WHITES SET TO BE MINORITY IN BIRMINGHAM


After 44 years of the National Front warning the British people that our land was being taken away from us, it seems our predictions are about to be confirmed. A census is expected to reveal that white children are a minority group in Birmingham.

A study by researchers at the University of Manchester has predicted that more than half of children in Birmingham will be from black and Asian communities when the census is carried out in March. It is predicted that the percentage of children coming from a White back ground will be at 47 per cent, which is a huge drop from 53 per cent back in 2006.

For a long time now, various public bodies have been trying to predict when the “tipping point” will be reached which will push non-British people into a clear majority. Very worryingly, experts are predicting that by 2026 that non-white guests will amount to a staggering 64 per cent.

This is the first clear warning sign that our country is slowly being taken over. I say slowly, but it was only ten years ago, back in 2001, the census showed that 70.4 per cent of the Birmingham population was white and a still too large percentage of 26.6 percent were a mixture of various different ethnic groups, primarily those of an Asian and African- Caribbean background.

The city is already feeling this drastic shift in the racial make-up of its populace in the educational system. The Educational Department has warned that language difficulties among non-English speaking pupils is the main contributing factor behind many schools across the city suffering from poor performance.

When are the people of Britain going to wake up to the truth…. Our country is being over-run with unwanted and unneeded guests. If we wish to keep Britain British, we must end immigration, and start a phrased policy of repatriation.

The National Front is Britain’s only political party which has faced up to the dire consequences of continuing with the open border policy which labour started, and the Lib-Con coalition have continued with. We are the only party tough enough to give you the facts and not beat around the bush. Unlike the three main Parties, we don’t play lip-service and only speak tough on the issues the British people care about when we need your votes. We believe firmly in our policies and care greatly for the betterment of Britain, and bringing the end to the ludicrous policy of un-limited immigration.

Join the National Front.- PUTTING BRITAIN FIRST FOR 44 YEARS

Thursday, 18 November 2010

WHITE BRITONS TO BECOME MINORITY BY 2066!!!!


Once again, what the National Front has been saying for over 40 years has been proved right by another report. It has been revealed that white Britons will be a minority by 2066 if the current influx of un-wanted guests continues unabated, according to research by Professor David Coleman, of Oxford University.

This leading population expert has warned that failure to deal with the influx of foreign workers could “change the national identity”.

Professor Coleman’s comments come just as the Migration Advisory Board prepares to give its recommendations for the coalition’s proposed cap on immigration.

It cannot not be denied on any level, something has to be done before we lose our country to unwanted and un-needed guests. If immigration continues at its current level on the long term, which is estimated at around 180,000 (not including illegal immigrants) a year, the white British born population would face a sharp decline from 80 per cent to a mere 59 per cent in 2051, according to an analysis of figures from the Office of National Statistics. If the trend continues, the British, as defined as English, Welsh, Scottish, and Irish Born citizens, will be a minority in their own country by 2066.

Now, the Coalition has proposed a cap on immigration, which sounds great right? No,.. before you get too excited, instead of helping the dire situation we Britons find ourselves in, it will only prolong the inevitable. Even if they get the cap down to say 80,000 a year, prof Coleman says white Britons would be outnumbered by 2080.

Lets stop beating around the bush, and lets get down to the hard facts. We are in a desperate situation… the ethnic minority population grew by an astounding 2 million between 2001 and 2007, from 13 per cent to nearly 16 per cent, and now, foreign mothers account for a quarter of all births in Britain. Both Leicester and Birmingham are expected to become white minority areas in the next 20 years, while two London boroughs have already become white minority areas.

We must put an end to this despicable situation which has been forced upon us by greedy and spineless governments, whose only interest is profit through the importation of cheap labour. Is this really a legacy you want to leave your children and great grand children? To you really want to allow them to become outnumbered in their own land, with no country to truly call their own?

It is a sad fact that many Britons have watched and allowed their country be given away, and it is truly disappointing to see this once great nation become the third rate hell hole it has become. But its not too late to change these dire circumstances.. there is still a shining hope, a beacon of light as it were… Our hope lies with the National Front… The ONLY British political party who holds British interests at heart, and would see to it that all immigration is brought to a halt, and a humane and phrased policy of repatriation would be put into place to ensure that Britain remains British.

Britain must remain in British Hands.,..

Friday, 12 November 2010

IAIN DUNCAN SMITH'S WELFARE PROPOSALS TO LEAVE POOR DESTITUTE WHILE 70% OF THE 4 MILLION NEW JOBS TAKEN BY IMMIGRANTS


Yesterday, Work and Pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith unveiled his half-baked welfare reforms, in which he vowed to put the brakes on the UK’s benefits gravy train…. While this sounds good, and I would be the first to say that the work shy should be punished by having their benefits taken from them, his plans would also severely effect those who are eagerly looking for work in an environment where there is no work to be found.

His proposals are ludicrous beyond belief… Lets look at this logically… If their isn’t much work available, how are those looking for work supposed to find a job. This is the fatal flaw in Iain’s proposals…. Without work they cant work. It is really that simple.

I do agree with some aspects of the proposal; for instance, his new Universal Credit, which will replace all benefits in 2013, will make sure anyone turning down employment or training courses will see their benefits stopped, which is fair enough. However, what I don’t agree with, is also punishing those who are more than actively looking for work, and cant find any.. The risk is, the poor could end up destitute as they get punished for a situation that the present government and the former government created..

Iain Duncan Smith revealed also yesterday that there was 4 million jobs created under LIEbour, and a huge 70 per cent was taken by immigrants.

The reason for all these reforms is to try and get out of the debt that Labour created for us… So let me give a few of my ideas to ease the debt, while still ensuring that there is a viable safety net for those unfortunate enough to be out of work.

Firstly; the 70 per cent of those 4 million jobs should be taken away from the non-natives, and be reserved for native Britons, which would ease the unemployment rate by an huge amount,

Secondly; Instead of sending billions of pounds to foreign nations in the name of aid, we should keep the money in our own hands, we may find we are not actually that bad off, and these desperate and damaging cuts being put forward by the traitors in Parliament would not be needed…

The National Front is a party of common sense. We believe that looking after the British Public is the number one goal of any government, unlike the current and past governments, who seem to think Britain should be the worlds bank, and the worlds employer… We will ensure that British jobs will remain in British hands, and while we will keep the safety net of the benefit system, we would also create initiatives to get people back into work, and those who refuse to go to work when the opportunity arises because they have become too comfortable on benefits would be punished with a cut to their benefits….

Thursday, 24 June 2010

IMMIGRATION IS KEY TO BRITAIN'S POPULATION GROWTH!

It is a fact that Britain is becoming overcrowded. You can see that for yourself; just look at the seemingly endless amounts of houses being built. And today, the latest count has revealed that the British population is set to reach 62 million, as it edges ever closer, mainly due to the influx of immigrants.

Numbers of people in the country went up by 394,000 to reach 61,792,000 by the middle of last year, the Office of National Statistics said.

The ONS seemed to be trying to down play the part that immigration has played in Britain’s huge population growth, when they said that the latest leap in numbers has been pushed by growing birth rates more than immigration. They point out that 45 per cent of the growth was directly due to immigration, and 55 per cent was due to natural increases- ie, the amount of births exceeded the amount of deaths…. However, what they neglect to tell you is that the rising birth rate is unfortunately a product of immigration- since one in four births were to mothers born outside the UK.

We have to act now before the population reaches the 70 million mark, which experts have predicted will happen within the next twenty years. We no longer can accept the empty promises of the lying, cheating traitors who make up our government. We simply do not have the infrastructure to cope with the strain of our ever growing population. Public services will sink to new lows, education standards will become abysmal as teachers struggle to understand the different languages spoken by the new arrivals, housing will become even more scarce, our streets will be plagued by foreign criminals, racial tensions and social discord will become even more apparent, and our people will become a minority in our own country.

There is only one solution to the situation we white Britons find ourselves in. And that is the National Front. We are the only party which has policies that face the issues of today head on, and we are the only party with the balls to implement these policies……. Lets keep Britain British……. Repatriation now.

Sunday, 2 May 2010

BRITISH POPULATION TO RISE BY 1.1 MILLION, DUE TO MASS IMMIGRATION

Another day, another damning report. According to a study which is based on an analysis of official Government figures, the UK population is on course to rise by an extra 1.1million during the next term of parliament as a result of the insane open door policy.

This will mean a huge strain will be put on our already overstretched public services. The study, by the think tank MigrationWatch, tells us that the UK population will rise from 62.2 million to a 64.3 million between now and 2015.

This huge population growth is worrying, especially when one considers that over half of this growth is down to mass immigration, which is taking into account both those who move to Britain, and the babies born to immigrants.

Some commenter’s are claiming that the true outcome could depend on who wins the next election, but we all know, no matter which mainstream party gets in, the open door will remain firmly open.

The study shows that the 1.1million population growth will include a further 222,000 children, which is enough children to fill up 550 average sized primary schools, and 110 secondary ones….. When will the people of Britain wakeup and realise that these current trends are unsustainable. We cannot afford it, and will drag our public services to an all time low. On top of that, British children will be in classes filled with children who barely speak a word of English, which will make it harder for our children to progress if the teacher has to keep explaining what she is saying.

We really cannot keep going on like this. Britain needs to wake up, and kick the traitors out of parliament, and replace them with people who have nothing but British interests in mind. The ONLY party with the British people in mind is the National Front… the party which has been putting Britain first for over 40 years.

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

IMMIGRANT BABY BOOM WILL COST YOU £1BN!!


Those amongst the PC crowd and the advocates of our open border policy love to argue about the supposed economic benefits of uncontrolled immigration. Day after day we hear about how migrants are boosting our economy, helping keep taxes down and helping to maintain our public services.

But once again another study has come out to put these ludicrous claims to rest.

A study has revealed that us taxpayers will have to face a soaring bill to pay for extra school places- most of which will be created to accommodate immigrant children.

The study revealed the majority of the £1bn needed will be used to create 96,000 extra school places- 67,000 will be to non-British children. According to the study conducted by Migrationwatch, of the 96,000 increase, more than half of the children will be born to non-British parents- and around a sixth (13,000) will be to children who has one non-British parent. And that leaves British children who will account for 29,000 of the increase.

This study comes out just after it has been revealed that tens of thousands of parents are finding it increasingly difficult to get their children into the school they want because of lack of places thanks to new-Labour’s open door policy.

Migrationwatch’s chairman Sir Andrew Green said- “ this is just one example of the impact of mass immigration on our public services…. An even bigger one is housing, where immigration accounts for 40 per cent of all new households…. This means we will have to build nearly 2,000 houses a WEEK just for new immigrants and their families.”

Ok, lets break this down. The Office for National Statistics revealed that the British population hit the 61million mark for the first time, however, under current trends the British population will hit 70million in the next 25 years. This will mean that our public services will collapse and the public purse will be shot.

It should be obvious that mass immigration is unsustainable, and it is us Brits who will be paying the bill. No one can deny that our public infrastructure is near breaking point and our public services are bursting at the seems under the strain. Thanks to successive governments betraying the British people, Britain is now the second most populated country in the western world.

ITS TIME TO VOTE NATIONAL FRONT, THE ONLY PARTY THAT WILL CLOSE THE OPEN DOOR.

STOP IMMIGRATION NOW!!

Friday, 5 June 2009

TAXPAYER PAYING FOR INTERPRETERS SO IMMIGRANTS CAN BECOME “BRITISH” CITIZENS.


Yes. The British public is being forced to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds to pay for interpreters for immigrants who cannot speak English, so that they can obtain British passports. This growing cost to the taxpayer for interpreters makes a bloody mockery to the Governments pledge that migrants wanting to settle in the UK must first demonstrate that they can speak English.

According to the governments pledge by the time newcomers are applying for citizenship they would have already passed a citizenship test and are supposed to at least be able to answer basic questions in English. But translators are still needed for some when they attend the face-to-face interviews.

More than a quarter of a million pounds of YOUR money has been spend on such pointless services by the Identity and Passport Services (IPS) last year.

In the face-to-face interviews, applicants are questioned for 20 minutes on personal information such as bank accounts and past addresses. Most applicants have already lived in the country for about five years and yet they still need interpreters.

The fact is this, these people have no right to a British citizenship. You can only be British if your ancestors are of Scottish, English, Walsh, or Northern Irish heritage. You cannot just come to Britain and decide your British, and it takes more than just being born in Britain. If I was born in China, by no stretch of the imagination could I be classed as Chinese.

We have to reclaim our identity. The British racial heritage is one to be celebrated not given away, let alone for the taxpayer to subsidise the loss of our identity.
THE NATIONAL FRONT’S POLICY ON IMMIGRATION.
The National Front believes that the world contains a rich diversity of races and consequent cultures. We believe in the preservation of these races. As each race has evolved it has developed its own social structures, its own customs and its own culture. These are different for each race and have been built up to suit the character of each separate race.

In the case of Britain the National Front upholds the wish of the majority of British people for Britain to remain a white country, with customs and a culture which have been developed to suit our character. Consequently the National Front would halt all non-white immigration into Britain and introduce a policy of phased and humane repatriation of all coloured people currently resident here. Such a policy would be expected to extend over 10-15 years and its completion would thus depend on the recurrent election of successive NF governments.

The National Front believes that this is the only way to halt the steadily rising racial tension and violence that is becoming part of everyday life in modern Britain.

In regards to white immigration, this would only be allowed where there are particular reasons such as the possession of particular skills or in the case of political refugees. Until the problem of unemployment is solved, the NF would seek to keep such immigration to a minimum.

BRITAIN’S NEW PAPERWORK SYSTEM IS MAJOR SECURITY CONCERN.


An immigration officer who spent 17 years checking visas at Heathrow, has claimed that the new paperwork system for allowing temporary entry for visitors is a major concern. Mike Whiting- a retired chief immigration officer with over 30 years experience at the UK Immigration Service- has said that the cost cutting within the new UK Border Force means the loss of vital face-to-face interview with visa applications, resulting in an “open door” immigration policy.

He said “ By losing personal interviews you are losing the personal touch. The system is much more open to abuse now when dealing only with documents in countries where it is easy to obtain forgeries. In those days when people with visas arrived at a port or airport an immigration officer still questioned them. But nowadays the emphasis is not on having a second bite of the cherry unless someone really stands out. The emphasis is to get them through as quickly.”

This state of affairs is unacceptable. Any Tom Dick or Harry could waltz into our country to abuse the British Benefit system. This is a great example of Lib-Lab-Con’s treason against the British people, by allowing anyone to walk in, whether they be terrorists, or here to abuse the benefit system. The National Front would stop all immigration and start a policy of phased and humane repatriation. The National Front recognises that Britain is a small country with limited space, and limited resources, we recognise that with a random mixture of different cultures, races ect in one country causes racial tensions, social discord, and will eventually lead to the White people of these lands to become a minority.

STOP IMMIGRATION< START REPATRIATION- VOTE NATIONAL FRONT

Tuesday, 26 May 2009

THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION AND YOU

There is an endless list of why Britain should cut all ties with the European Parliament. If Britain doesn’t, then the British people will loose their sovereignty. The fact that the EU is doing everything in its power to force the sinister European Constitution onto the British public is a clear sign of the EU’s ambition of becoming a Superstate, in which they wish Britain to be a part of. We must resist this tyrannical, foreign body, otherwise we will become a mere state in the United States of Europe, and have no control over our nation.

The European Constitution will only have adverse effects for Britain. I have outlined a few of the issues that we would face under European rule.

1. The European Constitution would make it harder to fight crime.

The Constitutional Treaty would give the EU considerable power over crime, policing and our Law Courts. This sinister treaty would mean that that EU judges would gain power over justice and policing. Under the constitution, the European Court of Justice would become the highest court in the land and would also mean that a substantial amount of Britain’s laws would be created in Brussels; which is a huge transfer of our national sovereignty, as the government have admitted.

Under EU law, it would become illegal to try someone twice for the same crime. This would mean that criminals like Billy Dunlop would be walking the streets. In case you didn’t know; Billy Dunlop was successfully convicted of murdering Julie Hogg when new evidence came to light 15 years after he was acquitted.

The Constitutional Treaty also states that the severity of penalties should not be disproportionate to the criminal offence. This would undermine the discretion of British judges to keep infamous killers like Rosemary West in prison for life.

The treaty would allow the EU police force, Europol, to conduct investigations on British soil. This has worrying implications, because unlike the British police forces, Europol officers are largely unaccountable. They are completely immune to prosecution for acts performed in the course of their duties, and they are also not compelled to testify in court. Europol also has its own problems with fraud, for example, its offices were raided by Belgium police as part of a fraud investigation.

The European Prosecutor Eurojust, will also get sweeping new powers. A spokesman for Eurojust- Johannes Thuy- confirmed that “ we would compel the British police to make a prosecution.”

2. The European Constitution would give the EU power over our foreign policy and defence.

If the constitution does get accepted, it would mean that there will be an EU foreign Minister, an EU Diplomatic Service, and the constitution would give the right to the EU to sign treaties on our behalf.

The Spanish Prime Minister, Jose Zapatero, predicts that “ we will undoubtedly see European embassies in the world, not ones from each country, with European diplomats and a European foreign service. We will see Europe with a single voice in security matters. We will have a single voice within NATO”. At first the British Government opposed many of these proposals, but being weak kneed it soon gave in.

The Constitutional Treaty also would set up a “structured cooperation” group, in which the UK will be forced to be apart of. The treaty states that members would have to achieve “ approved objectives concerning the level of investment expenditure on defence equipment and bring their defence apparatus into line with each other”. In a European Federalists research paper they noted that “Structured Co-operation in the field of defence is a significant step toward a Single European Army”.
German Chancellor Angela Merkal has also expressed a want for a single European Army: “ Within the EU itself, we will have to move closer to establishing a common European army”.

Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi has said “ When I was talking about the European army, I was not joking. If you don’t want to call it a European army, don’t call it a European army. You can call it “Margaret”, you can call it “Mary Anne”, you can call it any name”.

The Spanish Prime Minister Jose Zapatero said that “ Europe must believe that it can be in 20 years the most important world power! The constitution is an important step in this direction”.

What all this means in practice is that while our troops are being undermined in Afghanistan and Iraq with poor equipment and a want for just the basic equipment, the EU wants to divert billions of pounds to wasteful projects such as the Galileo satellite System- all because of its desire to play the role of world “Superpower”. Put aside the fact that our troops should not even be in Afghanistan or Iraq, the above is bad for our armed forces.

3. The Constitution would mean that we would have less control over Asylum Seekers and immigrants.

Under the Constitution Treaty, the European Court of Justice would gain a considerably amount of new powers to determine the “rights” of Asylum seekers and immigrants to reside in Britain. The Government have admitted that with the introduction of the Constitution Treaty would come more expensive Asylum and immigration appeals. In November 2006 Geoff Hoon said: “There is clearly a risk that adding what is in effect an avenue of appeal at a very early stage in the process might be an opportunity of further complicating of further complicating our existing asylum and immigration processes.”

The Charter of Fundamental Right, which is legally binding under the sinister constitution, would mean that Britain would not be able to deport terror suspects and other foreign criminals. This would mean, on top of all the other immigrants draining tax payers money away, we would have to pay for these criminals, and we would have to subsidize asylum seekers who are waiting for their case to be heard. It currently takes two years before the European Court of Justice even begins to hear an appeal.

Under the constitution there will be a new “burden sharing” requirement, which means that British taxpayers, who are already burdened with immigrants, will have to pay for immigrants in other countries.

Noone can disagree that under the Constitutional Treaty the European Court of Justice would end up making what is essentially political decisions. It wouldn’t matter if the entire British public disagreed with what the EU were doing, it would be impossible to overturn the rulings.

4. The Constitutional Treaty would mean the EU had more control over our public services.

HEALTH AND EDUCATION
The Constitutional treaty means that the EU would have complete control over the British Health service, and the British people would have no right to reject legislation in this area. This would mean that the EU would regulate medical standards. A new “right to preventive healthcare2 would open the NHS up to influx of costly ambulance-chasing lawsuits. The constitution would end the right to reject legislation concerning trade agreements in public services like health and education. In other words, our Parliament would no longer have a say over deals which will determine how these services are managed.

TRANSPORT: Under the constitution, the British people would loss the right to reject legislation concerning transport. Jacques Barrot, EU Transport Commissioner, recently revealed that the EU wants to run EU wide road pricing operations, but as the AA point out, this would lead to a huge loss of privacy.

The above is only a few of the issues that Britain face if the UK accepts the wretched Constitutional Treaty, and in doing so accept the tyrannical rule of the European Union. Below I have outlined some of the policies of the National front which relate to the above issues.

European Union.

The National Front supports the right of self-determination for all European nations and demands that right for Britain. It seeks a Europe where each nation is friendly to all others but where no nation seeks to dominate or interfere in the affairs of another. Consequently the NF would withdraw Britain from the European Union.
The NF would encourage the development of cultural and sporting links between other European nations. It would encourage the cultural diversity between the nations of Europe and resist attempts to eliminate this. It totally opposes the monetary and political merging of the separate nations into a super-state.

Defence
The protection of the British people at home and throughout the world is the responsibility of the government. It is for this purpose (and this purpose alone) that we require our armed forces, which have such a proud record in defending our nation. No British politician wants a war but it is a sad fact that Britain must always be prepared for a whole range of eventualities including the less likely ones. This is particularly true when the Middle East is in a period of change and uncertainty.

There is no realistic defence without a basic defence strategy. The National Front's defence strategy is that Britain must maintain a defence capability able to inflict massive damage on any other countries in the world should they act as an aggressor. The only other requirement is the ability of our forces to defeat any internal terrorist threat. The equipment with which our forces are armed must be designed and built in the UK and must remain solely under the control of this country.

The National Front totally opposes the use of British troops by the United Nations to carry out their political adventures. It also opposes any attempt to form a European army under foreign control and will withdraw Britain from NATO.

Race and immigration
The National Front believes that the world contains a rich diversity of races and consequent cultures. We believe in the preservation of these races. As each race has evolved it has developed its own social structures, its own customs and its own culture. These are different for each race and have been built up to suit the character of each separate race.

In the case of Britain the National Front upholds the wish of the majority of British people for Britain to remain a white country, with customs and a culture which have been developed to suit our character. Consequently the National Front would halt all non-white immigration into Britain and introduce a policy of phased and humane repatriation of all coloured people currently resident here. Such a policy would be expected to extend over 10-15 years and its completion would thus depend on the recurrent election of successive NF governments.

The National Front believes that this is the only way to halt the steadily rising racial tension and violence that is becoming part of everyday life in modern Britain.

In regards to white immigration, this would only be allowed where there are particular reasons such as the possession of particular skills or in the case of political refugees. Until the problem of unemployment is solved, the NF would seek to keep such immigration to a minimum

NHS
The National Front would provide an entirely free National Health Service and this would include the abolition of prescription charges. When people fall ill they are likely to be losing money in any case and we can see no justification in prescription charges. However, checks on doctors' prescriptions would be made to make sure the Health Service is not wasting money.

Whilst the NF expects all parts of the NHS to use money efficiently and carefully, a National Front government would make available sufficient funds to eliminate all waiting lists for medically needed operations and treatments. This will take priority over other items of expenditure.

The National Front believes that the NHS should be made available to all foreign visitors who fall ill during their stay, however this system is being abused by people who arrive in this country fully aware of an existing health condition - this would be stopped. The NF is opposed to abortion on principle and would only sanction one where a mother has conceived as a result of rape, where medical opinion asserts that there is a genuine and serious danger to the health or life of the mother if the pregnancy is allowed to continue, or where medical opinion asserts that the foetus is seriously damaged or malformed. All such abortions are dependent on the mother's consent. Under a National Front government the days of abortion being used as a form of post-coital contraception will end.

FREEDOM
For the last thousand years the British people have fought, and sometimes died, to preserve our basic freedoms. The National Front wholeheartedly believes that these freedoms must be maintained. Consequently the National Front believes in the introduction of a bill of rights to guarantee basic freedoms including:

Equal and free access to justice
Freedom of speech and publication and distribution of printed matter
Freedom of access to publicly owned assembly facilities
Freedom for orderly demonstrations in public
The right to vote and stand for election for public office without onerous financial or other qualifications
Freedom from arbitrary arrest

Those are a few of our policies which I think are relevant here.

Moving on.

WHAT WILL THE SWINDON NF DO TO HELP STOP THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION BEING ACCEPTED IN BRITAIN.
The National Front, up and down the country, will continue to campaign against EU dictatorship in Britain. However on a local level I have started a campaign. Its an attempt to make central Government stick to their promise and give the British people a referendum. And everyone of you can help. In actual fact, I need everyone of you to help. Whether you live in Swindon or not, it doesn’t matter. As long as you have a voice than you can help.

Basically, I have found a way in which to bring about a referendum in a Parish council which poses the question: “ should there be a national referendum on Britain’s membership in the EU?” More Councils- district councils, parish councils ect- that hold a referendum and with more “yes” votes, the more likely that Brown will hold a referendum.

I will give anyone who is willing to try and make a difference all the guidance and advice they will need- everything from lists of legislation that gives them the right to hold a referendum, to how you can insure you will get a good turn out.

If you are interested please email me at Swindon@yahoo.co.uk, and we will win this fight together.

BRITAIN FIRST- VOTE NATIONAL FRONT

Wednesday, 20 May 2009

70% OF BRITONS AGREE WITH THE NATIONAL FRONT!

This is an article taken from

http://www.nationalfrontnorth.com/seventy.htm

A Yougov poll survey has shown that seven out of ten British adults want a massive cut in immigration; the poll also showed that only one in twenty supported the current record levels.

These un-fettered levels have seen Britain’s population increase by at least 300,000 every year for the last five years.

The findings suggest immigration could become a significant election issue and sparked warnings that voters could turn to parties like the National Front if mainstream politicians fail to acknowledge their concerns.

Due to EU regulations Britain has not got any control over migration from other EU countries such as Poland and other Eastern European countries.

The poll, commissioned by Migration Watch for the Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration, was published on the eve of the release of immigration figures today.

It found that 79 per cent of people were concerned or very concerned about immigration. Seventy per cent of the 2,072 respondents favoured cutting levels by 80 per cent or more.

Of those, 17 per cent said net immigration should be brought below 50,000 a year - a level last seen in the early 1990s.

Another 39 per cent favoured a policy of zero net immigration, with the numbers settling in the UK matching the numbers emigrating. Sixteen per cent said the number of immigrants should be lower than those leaving.

Just over half of more affluent voters - ABC1s - wanted either zero or negative net immigration, while 63 per cent of 18 to 34-year-olds favoured a figure below 50,000.

Home Office ministers say their new points-based immigration system represents a tough crackdown.

The National Front say that this points-based system will have little effect, especially as Britain has no control over the numbers arriving from EU states. We must firstly leave the EU and its foreign control of our lands this will allow us to continue to trade with European countries without seeding sovereignty to them and being controlled by un-elected bureaucrats.

We would of course call for a complete halt in immigration then begin a process of repatriation. The question is how difficult can it be to secure an island?

Tom Linden

Wednesday, 6 May 2009

THE UK WILL HAVE TO BUILD A HOUSE EVERY SIX MINUTES TO KEEP UP WITH IMMIGRATION


An ex-Labour Minister claimed last week that the UK would have to build a house every six seconds around the clock for 20 years to keep up with the influx of immigrants. The former Welfare Minister, Frank Field, said that 70 percent of population growth in that 20 year time frame would be down to the influx of non-Britons. This amounts to 7 million people- or to but it in a different perspective, that is 7 new Birmingham’s.

Its not often that someone from Labour actually give the facts about immigration. And it is a very rare occasion that I agree with someone from Labour, but, I do agree with Frank when he said that the only losers are the indigenous Britons. And, its time that the British people woke the hell up to the current situation that Britain finds itself in. We are running out of time. It has been predicted that within the next hundred years that the native, white, British People will be a minority in their own country.

When we reach a situation that 40 percent of all houses built in Britain over the last decade have been given to immigrants-is official statistics suggest- then we must start to realise that we are losing our country..

Nearly 600,000 properties have been needed to house immigrants since 1997- an average of 66,000 each year from 1997 to 2005 ( the latest year figures are available)- making it a grand total of 592,000 homes. And experts say that this number would have risen since 2005 due to mass eastern European immigration.

We wouldn’t need to build so many houses- 40 percent less. We need to preserve our pleasant green land, we are a small country, we limited space, we cannot keep building, because, not before too long, we will have run out of space, and then what. Vote National Front, and insure that our children and our grand children have a land to live off. WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTANCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR WHITE CHILDREN.

Sunday, 8 March 2009

Friday, 7 November 2008

More activities


This was put up down Fleming Way, and was up for around 2 days..... Make sure you attend the NF march on Remembrance Sunday, go to www.uknf.org for more detils.