THE DARK SIDE OF POLITICS: DAVID MILIBAND

We have all heard about the Labour leadership contest. While all the candidates could be described as having dodgy backgrounds, and holding views which no sane person could agree with, one candidate, Mr David Miliband, has a darker political career than most.

David Miliband, the candidate who is most likely to become the next leader of the Labour party, is also the man who knowingly allowed terror suspects to be transferred through British airspace, in order for them to be brutally tortured in third world countries, and he allowed British agents to gain information in this way.

Miliband also attempted to block public disclosure of information regarding the torture of former Guantanamo inmate Binyam Mohamed. This is the same guy, who tried to preach to the British public about ethics. Maybe we should ask ourselves, what is so ethical about hiding Britain’s involvement in torture?

Now, quite worryingly, David is also the guy who announced his intention in changing the law on “universal jurisdiction”. It was stated in the Jewish Chronicle, he was “pushing hard within Whitehall” for such a cause. He put so much of his energy and time to try and ensure that Israeli war criminals could land in Britain, and could avoid justice…..

Time and time again, this slim ball tries to preach on about how he knows what British values are; but lets be honest, his actions says otherwise… While that could be debated, one thing we can be sure of is that he surely knows what Israeli interests are, and he is doing his utmost in promoting these interests.

For instance, Miliband was listed on an Israeli propaganda site as an “Israeli Hasbara (propaganda) author”.. god knows what that is meant to mean?!….

One interesting thing is though…. On the 5th May 2010, when it was almost certain that Gordon Brown was going to be ousted out after Labour’s predicted loss at the elections and that there will be a possibly leadership contest, The Israeli hasbara site where he appeared, disappeared….Coincidence? You make you own conclusion…..

Anyway, lets carry on with her analysis of this rather sinister character… Just like Tony bLAIR, David Miliband is a keen supporter of Moral Interventionism, and therefore supports the killing of 1.5 million Iraqis, all in the name of democracy?! In 2008, Miliband maintained that spreading democracy to far off lands that have nothing at all to do with us should be a “ great progressive project; and the means need to combine both soft and hard power.”

So this raises some questions; is torture hard or soft politics? And if he such an ethical man, may I ask what is so ethical about trying to change Britain’s Universal Jurisdiction? What on earth is moral about the killing of innocent people, all in the name of democracy?

While I don’t support any of the other candidates in Labour leadership contest, out of them all, David Miliband is the most sinister of them all.

LEADING LABOUR MINISTERS WERE ONCE LINKED TO ORGANISATIONS THAT PROMOTE SEX WITH CHILDREN!

It has been revealed that 3 leading Labour Cabinet Ministers were linked to an organisation that was affiliated to groups that campaign for the legalisation of paedophilia.

Harriet Harman, before she became an MP, was legal officer in the late 1970’s for the National Council for Civil Liberties. Don’t let the name fool you. Though it may sound like a respectable organisation, it is indeed a sinister group. When Miss Harman joined the NCCL in 1978, PIE, or better known as the paedophile Information Exchange, had been affiliated with the NCCL for three years. Another sick and perverted group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, an offshoot of the vile Gay Liberation Front, had also been affiliated to the NCCL until it was absorbed into the PIE.

The only reason the PIE broke off its relationship with the NCCL in 1982 is because it went undercover, which was the same year that Harriet Harman left the NCCL to become a member of Parliament for Peckham.

The NCCL where responsible for keeping the name of an NCCL council member Jonathan Walters, out of the Peoples Newspaper when it ran a report on the Paedophile Action for Liberation, of which he was secretary, in 1975. The People still ran the story, but Walters was not named. The most shocking detail about this scandal is that a current Cabinet Minister was running the NCCL while all this with Walters was going on. The Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt MP, Secretary of State for Health, became General secretary of NCCL in 1974. The very next year, while Patricia Hewitt was General Secretary, the NCCL invited the Paedophile Information Exchange and the Paedophile Action for Liberation to affiliate. A top Labour Minister was apart of an organisation that asked groups that openly campaigned for the right of adults to have sex with children. It says a lot about Labour’s mentality.

In 1976, the now notorious paedophile Tom O’Carroll was invited to address the NCCL conference, which promptly voted to “deplore” the use of chemical castration treatments of paedophiles. In 1975, Keith Hose of the Paedophile Information Exchange addressed its second annual conference. Hose moved a motion on the conference organising committee for “relegating paedophile for ancillary status in conference”. The motion was seconded by Trevor Locke, who also just to happened to be a member of the Executive Council of the NCCL. “ An awareness and acceptance of the sexuality of children is an essential part of the liberation of the young homosexual,” the motion went on. And it was duly passed.

Jack Dromey, who married Harriet in 1982, and is now the treasurer of the Labour Party, was also heavily involved in the NCCL. He served on its executive committee from 1970 to 1979, so he was one of the ones who would of made the decision to invite the two paedophile groups to affiliate with the NCCL.

The question that must be asked… Why did these three Labour MP’s believe that paedophiles were a minority group who’s rights have been suppressed ? And do these MP’s still have those perverted views?

The National Front believe that paedophiles have no rights, and should be given the death penalty. PROTECT OUR YOUNG, HANG PAEDOPHILE SCUM.

LABOUR TO INTRODUCE ANTI-WHITE LEGISLATION

The Equalities Minister Harriet Harman has revealed that the Labour regime will formerly introduce anti-white legislation in the awarding of Government contracts. The measures will mean that firms that want tax-payer funded work could be judged on brand new criteria including their gender and how many Non-whites they employ. This basically means that a company that employs British workers, even if they can deliver services at a much cheaper rate and much more efficiently, will be pushed aside in favour of company’s that employ the “correct” number of non-whites.

In the usual messed up logic of the liberal left, Ms Harman has said that her new Equalities Bill will mean the annual £175 billion public procurement budget will be used to promote “equality”. WRONG! Instead, her bill will force employers to favour female and non-white job applicants over equally qualified white men in order to make up the race quotas. As she herself inadvertently admits, Labour’s new bill will favour companies who employ non-whites…. She said “ All other things being equal, if there are two companies bidding for a contract and one has a much better equality record, then it would be down to the procuring authority to choose that one.” Ms Harman’s version of “equality” is in fact anti-white male discrimination.
No matter what label you put on it, it all amounts to discrimination….

And, we at the National Front are not the only ones to see fault in the new bill. I think it is worth noting that business leaders have said that Ms Harman’s bill will harm the UK economy. Miles Templeman, Director General of the Institute of Directors, said; “ Harriet Harman must be the only person in Britain to believe that in the midst of some of the most difficult business conditions in years, introducing yet more regulation is a way of “boosting economic recovery”.”

LABOUR TO INTRODUCE ANTI-WHITE LEGISLATION

The Equalities Minister Harriet Harman has revealed that the Labour regime will formerly introduce anti-white legislation in the awarding of Government contracts. The measures will mean that firms that want tax-payer funded work could be judged on brand new criteria including their gender and how many Non-whites they employ. This basically means that a company that employs British workers, even if they can deliver services at a much cheaper rate and much more efficiently, will be pushed aside in favour of company’s that employ the “correct” number of non-whites.

In the usual messed up logic of the liberal left, Ms Harman has said that her new Equalities Bill will mean the annual £175 billion public procurement budget will be used to promote “equality”. WRONG! Instead, her bill will force employers to favour female and non-white job applicants over equally qualified white men in order to make up the race quotas. As she herself inadvertently admits, Labour’s new bill will favour companies who employ non-whites…. She said “ All other things being equal, if there are two companies bidding for a contract and one has a much better equality record, then it would be down to the procuring authority to choose that one.” Ms Harman’s version of “equality” is in fact anti-white male discrimination.
No matter what label you put on it, it all amounts to discrimination….

And, we at the National Front are not the only ones to see fault in the new bill. I think it is worth noting that business leaders have said that Ms Harman’s bill will harm the UK economy. Miles Templeman, Director General of the Institute of Directors, said; “ Harriet Harman must be the only person in Britain to believe that in the midst of some of the most difficult business conditions in years, introducing yet more regulation is a way of “boosting economic recovery”.”

Sharia law being forced into Britain by the European Union….

Judges could soon be forced to bow down to Sharia Law in some divorce cases heard in Britain. An EU plan calls for family courts around Europe to hear cases using the laws of whichever country the couple involved have close links to…. First of all. If these people reside in this country, then they abide by British law, if they don’t like it, they should feel free to go to what ever country better suits them.

This plan would mean that a court in England would have to apply the laws of Saudi Arabia to a husband and wife living in Britain. Rightly, the Centre for Social Justice think tank attacked the so-called Rome III reform as ludicrous. It warned it would slow down cases, increase costs and lead to unjust results.

The tyrannical control the EU has over Britain has to stop now. We do not want Sharia Law, and we will not lay down and let the EU push it upon us.

The EU is anti-family, which is clear when one looks at some of the laws already concerning divorce. Currently, a couple from different EU states can have their divorce heard in the first country where one of them files divorce papers. Because different states offer varying financial advantages to spouses in terms of division of wealth, the resulting “race to court” in the best jurisdiction discourages couples from trying to save their marriages.

At the time of writing this, at least nine- not including the UK- are willing to accept the Rome III reform…. Lets just hope Britain wakes up, before our courts get turned into a mockery, where the vile Sharia law is practised…. Please, save our country from EU dictatorship. VOTE NF

The betrayal of the British Public

This, i am afraid to tell you is what the British electorate has subjected us to, when you vote for those vile creatures currently in Government, this is what you get! The above shows how the British Government are selling White, British Jobs on the cheap to the world, importing unwanted guests who cause social problems such as racial tensions, social discord, and anti-white racism. Read the above and then tell me that New-Labour are looking out for the British people.......

NHS and Immigration

Those left wing loonies love to claim that asylum seekers and immigrants are some kind of asset to our society. God knows where they got that assumption from, but if we where to take a hard look at all parts of our society they are a drain on resources and are very much a health threat. The NHS ( National Health Service) is a prime example. When one looks at the NHS with open eyes one sees that it paints a picture of non-Britons taking up resources and bring down the standards of the NHS.

Every day in Britain's national newspapers we read of the dreadful standards within the NHS, and there are reports aplenty clearly showing how poor the standards truly are. The National Audit Office reported that a million people a year were harmed by mistakes in NHS hospitals, the Audit Office reported that this figure is a huge understatement due to many deaths not being reported. Another report found that 40,000 patients die annually as a direct result of medical blunders and "adverse events." This again is likely to be an understatement....

These deaths and medical blunders are due to the fact that the Government are importing foreign doctors to save money... But for the most part these immigrants are under trained.

I read an article by John Holden which featured in the 29th August 2000 issue of the Daily Telegraph, in which he stated... " The fact that we have so many doctors from overseas when our medical schools are turning away large numbers of good quality candidates from indigenous sources owes a great deal to successive governments' policies of keeping down employment costs by importing low cost labour..."

That shows how little the Government care for its own people, they are willing to put us in the hands of under trained doctors to save money. I am always told that the point in immigration is to fill a gap in a certain sector of the job market... Well, obviously not.... Since Britons wish to be doctors but are turned away, which is by the governments own criteria is racial discrimination... Because of our Governments "money saving" scheme good quality doctors are struggling to get jobs because immigrants are given priority.

The cleansing standards have also fallen to abysmal levels.. The National Audit Office found that MRSA and other hospital breed infections kill 5,000 people each and every year in the UK. In another report, the ONS ( Office of National Statistics) they told us that in 2005 the Hospital Superbug- Clustriduim Difficile- has rose 69%. In the same year MRSA was mentioned on 1,629 death certificates. The ONS figures also showed that between 2001 and 2005 MRSA was mentioned in 1 in every 500 death certificates in England and wales, and C. Difficile was 1 in 250- which means, if things get no worse- which they will- then by the time the 55 million people alive in England and wales today pass away, C.Diff and MRSA will contribute to almost 400,000 deaths- Thats 400,000 needless deaths due to the Governments "money saving" scheme, which means the cleaners employed to clean our hospitals are for the most part non-British.. Is it a coincidence that since immigrants really started to flood in hospital superbugs have done nothing but rise?

Ok, some may be saying that the solution must be to make sure we only employ qualified doctors... It would help, but however, as patients they also take up resources.

One in twenty asylum seekers are HIV positive which costs the NHS £150,000 to treat each one, and once a HIV positive immigrant reaches our shores due to certain legislation, they cannot be returned to their country of origin. The most reliable estimate around is that each year 5,000 people come to the UK who are HIV+ and claim asylum knowing full well that once they get here they cannot be deported back. Now these will cost NHS about £800,000,000 annually, which is enough to build 7.5 hospitals... which to be honest, i would prefer the money to be spent on more hospitals than unwanted guests. Another report by the department of Health stated in 2001, 70% of women giving birth with HIV lived in London and 77% of these were born in Sub-Saharan Africa... Says a lot!

Some say that immigration hasn't had anything to do with the rise of HIV, well, of the 21,115 adults diagnosed with HIV between 1985 and 2003, just 9% were likely to have been infected within the UK... So how does any sane person come to the conclusion that immigration hasn't attributed to the rise of HIV in the UK?

Now, lets put the health risks to one side and going back to the issue of importing foreign doctors, what other reasons are there for not importing foreign doctors?

Now, those who support immigration claim that they care for the Third World- We all know they don't- but if they did have any compassion for the peoples of the Third World they to would oppose the importing of foreign doctors since the nations in which these immigrant doctors are coming from are facing REAL staff shortage... And let me give you the solution to this country's NHS going to wreck and ruin and the Third World's staff shortage.. STOP IMMIGRATION NOW AND START A POLICY OF PHASED REPATRIATION.. that way these Third World countries will have their doctors back.

For an example of these staff shortages which i mentioned... In Zambia, a mere 60 out of a 600 doctors trained in Zambia actually still work there, and in Zimbabwe 75% of the country's doctors have left since the early 1990's... did you know that there are more Malawian doctors and nurses in Manchester and Birmingham than there is in Malawi itself... and a quarter of Malawi's remaining medical staff is expected to die from aids in the next 6 years...

There is no need for te current importation of these doctors, it does harm to us and to the nations in which these doctors originally come from. Its time we stopped this madness and allow Britons to man British hospitals for our own health and for the health of the undeveloped nations.... START REPATRIATION NOW- BRITAIN FOR THE BRITISH