"Truth seldom is pleasant; it is almost invariably bitter. A loss of courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days..." Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Commencement address at Harvard University , June 8, 1978

Monday, 24 August 2009



I am writing to all police forces within the UK to inform them and advise them of OUR rights under the law, as it is being reported to me by branches across the country that police officers are abusing these hard fought for rights.
I would ask you to insure that your officers are well versed in the Human Rights act as detailed below and suggest that perhaps further training is required in some cases.

The National Front and its members are fed up with the actions of politized police officers across our country. We are no longer prepared to sit back and accept these anti-democratic actions by uniformed bullies.
Examples of the abuses reported are: - Members being asked for their names and addresses’ illegally, when this would not happen with any other parties’ members.
Accusations that leaflets are ‘illegal’, when we check them before they are printed to make sure they are ‘legal’.

General bullying tactics, harassment and hassle and attempts to disrupt the ‘political processes, in itself against the law.
Police officers told that the National Front is racist, being therefore anti-NF and preconditioned to respond in an aggressive manner initially.
We also expect your officers to ‘wear’ their shoulder numbers ‘and’ to indentify themselves with their name, rank and police station when requested as per the law.
There have been many instances reported to us that police officers have over stepped the mark and abused their powers.

We will also in future be instructing our members to demand copies of our images taken by your officers without OUR permission both still and moving re: the Data Protection Act.

For this reason we are instructing our members on their rights and in future should these abuses of power continue the officers concerned will have ‘official’ complaints made against them through the IPCC.

The details of these abuses will also receive prominence on the front page of our website.

We wish to work with the police especially when we are organising demonstrations and will continue to do so, but we demand that police officers treat us as participants in the political process and therefore acting legally.

“Please find below the areas where police training is required”

Article 10, European Convention on Human Rights
Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of expression. Before the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force, the right to freedom of expression was a negative one: you were free to express yourself, unless the law otherwise prevented you from doing so. With the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into English and Welsh domestic law, the right to freedom of expression is now expressly guaranteed.

However, the right to freedom of expression in Article 10 is not absolute. Interferences with the right to freedom of expression may be permitted if they are prescribed by law, pursue a legitimate aim and are necessary in a democratic society, that is, satisfy a pressing social need. The legitimate purposes for which freedom of expression can be limited are:

* National security, territorial integrity or public safety.
* The prevention of disorder or crime.
* The protection of health or morals.
* The protection of the reputation or rights of others.
* The prevention of the disclosure of information received in confidence.
* For maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

The Historic Right to Peaceful Protest
‘To speak of rights at all in this context is to recognise the constitutional shift which is now in progress.’
Mr Justice Stephen Sedley, November 1999

Public protest is deeply rooted in our political culture. There have been countless times in the past - even in the recent past - when public demonstrations of support for a cause, or opposition to a policy or government, have changed the course of history. 'People power' can be a potent political force, whether at a national or a local level; whether to do with political causes or single issues; whether in support of striking workers or bereaved families, or in opposition to globalisation, or the waging of unjustified wars. When people have nothing else to fight with, it is often their solidarity with each other - to stand together and be counted across communities and even across continents - which proves to be their most powerful weapon.

For as long as there have been governments there have been rules to restrict protest and dissent. Over the centuries the law in this area has developed piecemeal, adapting to the prevailing attitudes and concerns of the governments and courts of the day. This dynamic process reflects the struggle that lies at the heart of public order law - the natural tension between the amount of freedom we demand as demonstrators and the amount of restriction we as electors permit our Parliament to impose.

For centuries, legislators have resisted the notion of positive rights in the field of public protest and political expression. Whilst it might have been said that we were free to do anything which was not otherwise proscribed by law, to say that we had a positive right to assemble, to march together, to chant and to campaign - rights that might be weighed against the undoubted rights of property owners, road users or business people - was to swim against a strong current of judicial thinking and an ever-rising tide of repressive legislation, which appeared to tolerate protest only if it did not challenge or cause inconvenience to anyone. The constitutional shift that fundamentally altered this position was the incorporation into domestic law, in October 2000, of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). In the field of political protest the Convention has effect in four key areas:

• Right to Peaceful Assembly – Article 11
• Right to Freedom of Expression - Article 10
• Right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion – Article 9
• Right to respect for private and family life – Article 8

It forbids any public body, such as the police and local government, from acting in ways that conflict with the principles set out in the Convention.

It enables demonstrators to use the courts, in principle, to challenge decisions that would restrict protest; and might enable them to mount defences to non-violent criminal offences connected with political protest.

Article 11: Freedom of Assembly and Association
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

2. No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. This Article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the state.

There are two aspects to Article 11. It protects the right to peaceful assembly, which includes the freedom to hold public or private meetings, demonstrations, rallies and sit-ins, without interference from the State.

This may include a positive obligation on the State to ensure that demonstrators are protected from counter-demonstrators trying to prevent their demonstration. However, it does not generally include a positive obligation on the State to ensure that the right to peaceful assembly is protected on private property (Appleby v UK 2003).

Article 11 also protects the freedom to associate with others, including the right to form or join a political party or other group or association, and the right to belong to a trade union. However, the right to join a trade union does not extend to police officers, soldiers and some other groups who work for the Government. Article 11 also guarantees the right not to have to associate with others, including the right not to join a union and imposes a positive obligation on the State to secure this.

Article 11 is a qualified right. This means that an interference with the right can be justified. The circumstances in which an interference can be justified are similar to those which justify an interference with rights under Article 8 (See section headed ‘A qualified right’ under Article 8). You should note that a requirement to obtain prior authorisation or to provide prior information about an assembly will not constitute an interference with the freedom of assembly where the purpose of the requirements falls within one the legitimate aims set out in Article 11(2).

Tom Linden
National Press Officer National Front
Email nfpressoffice@googlemail.com

Sunday, 23 August 2009

Lloyds TSB discriminates against Non-Muslims: Boycott Lloyds TSB

For years now the National Front has been highlighting the blatant double standards that are ever present in today’s society. I have included many posts on this blog about positive discrimination, and now I have another example.

It was revealed yesterday in the Daily Mail that many Lloyds TSB customers are being hit with charges of up to an extortionate £200 a month if they go into the red- however, if you are a Muslim who use this bank, you will only get charged a mere £15.

Lloyds TSB set up a special Islamic Bank account which allows Muslims to stay faithful to their religion. Sharia Law (Islamic Law) does not permit the payment of interest so the typical Islamic account at Lloyds TSB has been set up without a Overdraft facility.

If a Muslim customer tries to withdraw more money than he has in his account, then it is blocked and a “return fee” is charged. With a few Islamic accounts such payment is authorised and an “unplanned overdraft fee” of £15 is then levied. The bank claims this to be a management fee, not a payment of interest, so that it does not contradict Islamic Law.

However, if a non-Muslim customer with a standard current account goes into the red by at least £100 without it being authorised are hit with an “unplanned overdraft fee” of £20 a day for a max of ten days. This could mean that a non-Muslim could be made to pay £200 in one month.

Basically, those who have a non-Islamic account are subsidizing those with an Islamic account. Which in my opinion would be illegal if the shoe was on the other foot. If Christians were given such preferential treatment, I am sure there would be an outcry from the left about discrimination and maybe even prosecution of Lloyds TSB managers.

Britain must stop pussy footing around Muslims. As long as they are here (which I hope will not be for much longer) they should integrate and accept the this country works. If they don’t like it, they can feel free to leave at any time.



As you may or may not be aware; The National Front is planning a protest against the Reading Gay Pride event which will take place on the 5th September.

The Thames Valley Police were helpful and gave some rather good suggestions as to a location for the demo. However, they have informed the Reading Pride committee- which is not really that big of a deal- and Reading Pride have placed a Press Release on their website. The Press Release suggests that the NF was un-cooperative with the police and that we plan to disrupt the Gay Pride festival, which is nothing but a pack of lies.

While we do oppose the holding of such degrading events, we will be protesting peacefully.

The Thames Valley and Wiltshire Press Officer, Christina, has written an email to The Reading Pride Committee, which you can view by clicking on the picture above.

Anyway; We need every true white nationalist to come out to Reading and oppose this vile showing of sexual perversion. Please try your best to make it.

If you are interested, please contact me on 07890802883 or email me on swindonnf@yahoo.co.uk.

And remember to check out the new Thames Valley NF website

Saturday, 22 August 2009


NF Deputy Chairman confronts Red.

Red gets detained by police after he gets aggressive.

Thursday, 20 August 2009

Anti-Gay Pride Demo Report

On saturday the 15th of August, the National Front held an anti-gay pride protest in Swindon. When arriving at the R.V point, we were greeted by police vans and two left-wing protestors. The police began to ask for the names of the NF members who had arrived. We told the police that they had no such right to do this, and we refused the request. Two members of "class war" began to make threats against an NF member, who simply laughed at them, it was strange how the police did not ask any questions to the left wing protestors. We then went to park our car in the town centre before starting the demonstration. At the traffic lights near to the R.V point, several hooded and masked protestors approached our car. One NF member got out and confronted them about the threats that they had made. There was no police in sight, but the protestors did not take any action or carry out the threats that they had made. These protestors were posuers who see communism as a "fashion accesory", the threats amounted to nothing and they did not deter us from carrying out our protest.

Ten NF members met up at the top of the town centre. We carried our placards and our banner. One homosexual began shouting abuse at us as soon as we had set up. The remarks were the usual media brain washed nonsense that we have become acustomed to. Some members of the public began to talk to us and showed some support for our demo. The demonstration was at the top of the town centre, this was an improvement compared to last year, but the demonstration point was by no means perfect, and there were much better places where we could have held the demonstration. This was viewed as part of the Swindon ultra left wing police force`s attempt at gagging the NF`s right to free speech.

The demonstration was a victory for the NF, We stood up to left wing bullies, and a hostile Stalinist police force, that had previously ruined an attempt by the NF to hold a public demonstration.

Report written by RK

There is going to be a demostration in Reading on the 5th September. If you would like to attend this event, then contact me on swindonnf@yahoo.co.uk or call/text me on 07890802883


Wednesday, 12 August 2009


The National Front would like to point out a few facts about why we are demonstrating against gay pride parades. The very nature and ideology behind White Nationalism, condems homosexuality and its promotion especially. Many other Nationalists such as Noau Dreapta in Romania and Forza Nuova in Italy believe that homosexuality should be removed from the public eye. Nationalists throughout the world believe the same. Family values are a essential part of Nationalism, there is no way that gay pride parades with some of the most sickening images against the family and Christianity can be acceptable to White Nationalists.

The National Front anti-gay pride demonstrations are in protest about the amount of public money being wasted on these parades, and the issue of the promotion of homosexuality to children, which the National Front believes is totally wrong. Any person that thinks promoting homosexuality to children as young as five years old needs locking up.

Since the NF have announced that we are to demonstrate against the gay pride parades, numerous attacks have been made against us. One verbal attack from the Swindon Nationalists blog page, this is a BNP blog page, has defended the gay pride child corrupting agenda. The person who has written this blog page stated that "if he was gay he would vote BNP" This is strange statement to be made from a Nationalist. The rest of the webpage looks more like a gay and lesbian website. In 2004 the BNP printed in the freedom newspaper that "most homosexuals are decent people and are potential supporters of party", we would hardly consider gay pride marchers as being patriotic to their country, clearly they are not.

It is shocking to see that the homosexual agenda is trying to corrupt all political parties. This agenda will never be accepted in the modern day National Front, and we will never water down our policies in regards to this issue.

Mike- " Please try and make it to the demostration this Saturday in Swindon. If you can make it please email me at swindonnf@yahoo.co.uk or contact my mobile at 07890-802-883

Monday, 10 August 2009


I am sorry for not taken the time to post on here for a while, but I have been extremly busy with the Demo- which is taking place next Saturday- and also creating a website for the Thames Valley and Wiltshire NF Unit.

Once I have done with the demo and got the website in to a place which I am happy with, I will start posting on here again. Until then, please feel free to have a look at the new website, but please remember that it is in no way finished.

Racial Regards